Discovery - University of Dundee - Online Publications

Library & Learning Centre

A Critical Discussion Game for Prohibiting Fallacies

A Critical Discussion Game for Prohibiting Fallacies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

View graph of relations

Authors

Research units

Info

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages25
JournalLogic and Logical Philosophy
Early online date26 Jul 2017
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - 26 Jul 2017

Abstract

The study of fallacies is at the heart of argumentation studies. In response to Hamblin’s devastating critique of the state of the theory of fallacies in 1970, both formal dialectical and informal approaches to fallacies developed. In the current paper, we focus on an influential informal approach to fallacies, part of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Central to the pragma-dialectical method for analysing and evaluating argumentative discourse is the ideal model of a critical discussion. In this discussion model, a dialectical perspective on argumentation is combined with a pragmatic take on communicative interaction. By formalising and computationally implementing the model of a critical discussion, we take a first step in the development of software to computationally model argumentative dialogue in which fallacies are prohibited along the pragma-dialectical norms. We do this by defining the Critical Discussion Game, a formal dialogue game based on the pragma-dialectical discussion model, executable on an online user-interface which is part of a larger infrastructure of argumentation software.

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Open Access permissions

Open

Documents

  • Final Published Version

    Final published version, 1 MB, PDF-document

    The journal offers access to the contents in the open access system on the principles of non-exclusive license Creative Commons (CC BY-ND 3.0).

DOI

Library & Learning Centre

Contact | Accessibility | Policy