Discovery - University of Dundee - Online Publications

Library & Learning Centre

A formal analysis of the AIF in terms of the ASPIC framework

Standard

A formal analysis of the AIF in terms of the ASPIC framework. / Bex, Floris; Prakken, Henry; Reed, Chris.

Computational Models of Argument: : proceedings of COMMA 2010. ed. / Pietro Baroni; Federico Cerutti; Massimiliano Giacomin; Guillermo R. Simari. Amsterdam : IOS Press, 2010. p. 99-110 (Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications; Vol. 216).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Harvard

Bex, F, Prakken, H & Reed, C 2010, 'A formal analysis of the AIF in terms of the ASPIC framework'. in P Baroni, F Cerutti, M Giacomin & GR Simari (eds), Computational Models of Argument: : proceedings of COMMA 2010. Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications, vol. 216, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 99-110, 3rd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, Desenzano del Garda, Italy, 8-10 September., 10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-99

APA

Bex, F., Prakken, H., & Reed, C. (2010). A formal analysis of the AIF in terms of the ASPIC framework. In P. Baroni, F. Cerutti, M. Giacomin, & G. R. Simari (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument: : proceedings of COMMA 2010. (pp. 99-110). (Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications; Vol. 216). Amsterdam: IOS Press. 10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-99

Vancouver

Bex F, Prakken H, Reed C. A formal analysis of the AIF in terms of the ASPIC framework. In Baroni P, Cerutti F, Giacomin M, Simari GR, editors, Computational Models of Argument: : proceedings of COMMA 2010. Amsterdam: IOS Press. 2010. p. 99-110. (Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications). Available from: 10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-99

Author

Bex, Floris; Prakken, Henry; Reed, Chris / A formal analysis of the AIF in terms of the ASPIC framework.

Computational Models of Argument: : proceedings of COMMA 2010. ed. / Pietro Baroni; Federico Cerutti; Massimiliano Giacomin; Guillermo R. Simari. Amsterdam : IOS Press, 2010. p. 99-110 (Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications; Vol. 216).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Bibtex - Download

@inbook{536d9ed6a5034023aadb3e9f89892b1e,
title = "A formal analysis of the AIF in terms of the ASPIC framework",
keywords = "ontology, argument interchange, formal argumentation framework",
publisher = "IOS Press",
author = "Floris Bex and Henry Prakken and Chris Reed",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-99",
editor = "Pietro Baroni and Federico Cerutti and Massimiliano Giacomin and Simari, {Guillermo R.}",
isbn = "9781607506188",
series = "Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications",
pages = "99-110",
booktitle = "Computational Models of Argument:",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - CHAP

T1 - A formal analysis of the AIF in terms of the ASPIC framework

A1 - Bex,Floris

A1 - Prakken,Henry

A1 - Reed,Chris

AU - Bex,Floris

AU - Prakken,Henry

AU - Reed,Chris

PB - IOS Press

CY - Amsterdam

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - <p>In order to support the interchange of ideas and data between different projects and applications in the area of computational argumentation, a common ontology for computational argument, the Argument Interchange Format (AIF), has been devised. One of the criticisms levelled at the AIF has been that it does not take into account formal argumentation systems and their associated argumentation-theoretic semantics, which are part of the main focus of the field of computational argumentation. This paper aims to meet those criticisms by analysing the core AIF ontology in terms of the recently developed ASPIC argumentation framework.</p>

AB - <p>In order to support the interchange of ideas and data between different projects and applications in the area of computational argumentation, a common ontology for computational argument, the Argument Interchange Format (AIF), has been devised. One of the criticisms levelled at the AIF has been that it does not take into account formal argumentation systems and their associated argumentation-theoretic semantics, which are part of the main focus of the field of computational argumentation. This paper aims to meet those criticisms by analysing the core AIF ontology in terms of the recently developed ASPIC argumentation framework.</p>

KW - ontology

KW - argument interchange

KW - formal argumentation framework

UR - http://copac.ac.uk/search?&isn=+9781607506188&sort-order=ti%2C-date

U2 - 10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-99

DO - 10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-99

M1 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781607506188

BT - Computational Models of Argument:

T2 - Computational Models of Argument:

A2 - Simari,Guillermo R.

ED - Simari,Guillermo R.

T3 - Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications

T3 - en_GB

SP - 99

EP - 110

ER -

Documents

Library & Learning Centre

Contact | Accessibility | Policy