BACKGROUND: Response to EGFR-targeted therapies in colorectal cancer patients has been convincingly associated with Kirsten-Ras (K-Ras) mutation status. Current mandatory mutation testing for patient selection is limited to the K-Ras 'hotspot' codons 12 and 13.
METHODS: Colorectal tumours (n = 106) were screened for additional K-Ras mutations, phenotypes compared in transformation and Ras GTPase activating assays and gene and pathway changes induced by individual K-Ras mutants identified by microarray analysis. Taqman-based gene copy number and FISH analyses were used to investigate K-Ras gene amplification.
RESULTS: Four additional K-Ras mutations (Leu(19)Phe (1 out of 106 tumours), Lys(117)Asn (1 out of 106), Ala(146)Thr (7 out of 106) and Arg(164)Gln (1 out of 106)) were identified. Lys(117)Asn and Ala(146)Thr had phenotypes similar to the hotspot mutations, whereas Leu(19)Phe had an attenuated phenotype and the Arg(164)Gln mutation was phenotypically equivalent to wt K-Ras. We additionally identified a new K-Ras gene amplification event, present in approximately 2% of tumours.
CONCLUSIONS: The identification of mutations outwith previously described hotspot codons increases the K-Ras mutation burden in colorectal tumours by one-third. Future mutation screening to facilitate optimal patient selection for treatment with EGFR-targeted therapies should therefore be extended to codon 146, and in addition should consider the unique molecular signatures associated with individual K-Ras mutations. British Journal of Cancer (2010) 102, 693-703. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605534 www.bjcancer.com (C) 2010 Cancer Research UK
AB -BACKGROUND: Response to EGFR-targeted therapies in colorectal cancer patients has been convincingly associated with Kirsten-Ras (K-Ras) mutation status. Current mandatory mutation testing for patient selection is limited to the K-Ras 'hotspot' codons 12 and 13.
METHODS: Colorectal tumours (n = 106) were screened for additional K-Ras mutations, phenotypes compared in transformation and Ras GTPase activating assays and gene and pathway changes induced by individual K-Ras mutants identified by microarray analysis. Taqman-based gene copy number and FISH analyses were used to investigate K-Ras gene amplification.
RESULTS: Four additional K-Ras mutations (Leu(19)Phe (1 out of 106 tumours), Lys(117)Asn (1 out of 106), Ala(146)Thr (7 out of 106) and Arg(164)Gln (1 out of 106)) were identified. Lys(117)Asn and Ala(146)Thr had phenotypes similar to the hotspot mutations, whereas Leu(19)Phe had an attenuated phenotype and the Arg(164)Gln mutation was phenotypically equivalent to wt K-Ras. We additionally identified a new K-Ras gene amplification event, present in approximately 2% of tumours.
CONCLUSIONS: The identification of mutations outwith previously described hotspot codons increases the K-Ras mutation burden in colorectal tumours by one-third. Future mutation screening to facilitate optimal patient selection for treatment with EGFR-targeted therapies should therefore be extended to codon 146, and in addition should consider the unique molecular signatures associated with individual K-Ras mutations. British Journal of Cancer (2010) 102, 693-703. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605534 www.bjcancer.com (C) 2010 Cancer Research UK
KW - K-Ras KW - mutation KW - colorectal tumour KW - Gene amplification KW - Personalised medicine KW - Signalling pathway KW - Costello syndrome KW - Point mutation KW - Colon cancer KW - Kirsten Ras KW - B-Raf KW - Cetuximab KW - Cells KW - Gene U2 - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605534 DO - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605534 M1 - Article JO - British Journal of Cancer JF - British Journal of Cancer SN - 0007-0920 IS - 4 VL - 102 SP - 693 EP - 703 ER -