Discovery - University of Dundee - Online Publications

Library & Learning Centre

An audit and feedback intervention for reducing antibiotic prescribing in general dental practice

An audit and feedback intervention for reducing antibiotic prescribing in general dental practice: the RAPiD Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

View graph of relations

Authors

  • Paula Elouafkaoui
  • Linda Young (Lead / Corresponding author)
  • Rumana Newlands
  • Eilidh M. Duncan
  • Andrew Elders
  • Jan E. Clarkson
  • Craig R. Ramsay
  • Translation Research in a Dental Setting (TRiaDS) Research Methodology Group

Research units

Info

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1002115
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalPLoS Medicine
Volume13
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 30 Aug 2016

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dentists prescribe approximately 10% of antibiotics dispensed in UK community pharmacies. Despite clear clinical guidance, dentists often prescribe antibiotics inappropriately. This cluster-randomised controlled trial used routinely collected National Health Service (NHS) dental prescribing and treatment claim data to compare the impact of individualised audit and feedback (A&F) interventions on dentists' antibiotic prescribing rates.

METHODS AND FINDINGS: All 795 antibiotic prescribing NHS general dental practices in Scotland were included. Practices were randomised to the control (practices = 163; dentists = 567) or A&F intervention group (practices = 632; dentists = 1,999). A&F intervention practices were allocated to one of two A&F groups: (1) individualised graphical A&F comprising a line graph plotting an individual dentist's monthly antibiotic prescribing rate (practices = 316; dentists = 1,001); or (2) individualised graphical A&F plus a written behaviour change message synthesising and reiterating national guidance recommendations for dental antibiotic prescribing (practices = 316; dentists = 998). Intervention practices were also simultaneously randomised to receive A&F: (i) with or without a health board comparator comprising the addition of a line to the graphical A&F plotting the monthly antibiotic prescribing rate of all dentists in the health board; and (ii) delivered at 0 and 6 mo or at 0, 6, and 9 mo, giving a total of eight intervention groups. The primary outcome, measured by the trial statistician who was blinded to allocation, was the total number of antibiotic items dispensed per 100 NHS treatment claims over the 12 mo post-delivery of the baseline A&F. Primary outcome data was available for 152 control practices (dentists = 438) and 609 intervention practices (dentists = 1,550). At baseline, the number of antibiotic items prescribed per 100 NHS treatment claims was 8.3 in the control group and 8.5 in the intervention group. At follow-up, antibiotic prescribing had decreased by 0.4 antibiotic items per 100 NHS treatment claims in control practices and by 1.0 in intervention practices. This represents a significant reduction (-5.7%; 95% CI -10.2% to -1.1%; p = 0.01) in dentists' prescribing rate in the intervention group relative to the control group. Intervention subgroup analyses found a 6.1% reduction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists who had received the written behaviour change message relative to dentists who had not (95% CI -10.4% to -1.9%; p = 0.01). There was no significant between-group difference in the prescribing rate of dentists who received a health board comparator relative to those who did not (-4.3%; 95% CI -8.6% to 0.1%; p = 0.06), nor between dentists who received A&F at 0 and 6 mo relative to those who received A&F at 0, 6, and 9 mo (0.02%; 95% CI -4.2% to 4.2%; p = 0.99). The key limitations relate to the use of routinely collected datasets which did not allow evaluation of any effects on inappropriate prescribing.

CONCLUSIONS: A&F derived from routinely collected datasets led to a significant reduction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN49204710.

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Open Access permissions

Open

Documents

  • Final Published Version

    Final published version, 904 KB, PDF-document

    © 2016 Elouafkaoui et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

DOI

Library & Learning Centre

Contact | Accessibility | Policy