Discovery - University of Dundee - Online Publications

Library & Learning Centre

An empirical approach to selecting community-based alcohol interventions

Standard

An empirical approach to selecting community-based alcohol interventions : combining research evidence, rural community views and professional opinion. / Shakeshaft, Anthony; Petrie, Dennis; Doran, Christopher; Breen, Courtney; Sanson-Fisher, Robert.

In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.01.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Shakeshaft, A, Petrie, D, Doran, C, Breen, C & Sanson-Fisher, R 2012, 'An empirical approach to selecting community-based alcohol interventions: combining research evidence, rural community views and professional opinion' BMC Public Health, vol 12, no. 1.

APA

Shakeshaft, A., Petrie, D., Doran, C., Breen, C., & Sanson-Fisher, R. (2012). An empirical approach to selecting community-based alcohol interventions: combining research evidence, rural community views and professional opinion. BMC Public Health, 12(1), doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-25

Vancouver

Shakeshaft A, Petrie D, Doran C, Breen C, Sanson-Fisher R. An empirical approach to selecting community-based alcohol interventions: combining research evidence, rural community views and professional opinion. BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 1;12(1).

Author

Shakeshaft, Anthony; Petrie, Dennis; Doran, Christopher; Breen, Courtney; Sanson-Fisher, Robert / An empirical approach to selecting community-based alcohol interventions : combining research evidence, rural community views and professional opinion.

In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.01.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bibtex - Download

@article{e180fc3a6624478eb66fe7732009905e,
title = "An empirical approach to selecting community-based alcohol interventions",
author = "Anthony Shakeshaft and Dennis Petrie and Christopher Doran and Courtney Breen and Robert Sanson-Fisher",
year = "2012",
volume = "12",
number = "1",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - An empirical approach to selecting community-based alcohol interventions

T2 - combining research evidence, rural community views and professional opinion

A1 - Shakeshaft,Anthony

A1 - Petrie,Dennis

A1 - Doran,Christopher

A1 - Breen,Courtney

A1 - Sanson-Fisher,Robert

AU - Shakeshaft,Anthony

AU - Petrie,Dennis

AU - Doran,Christopher

AU - Breen,Courtney

AU - Sanson-Fisher,Robert

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Background: Given limited research evidence for community-based alcohol interventions, this study examines the intervention preferences of rural communities and alcohol professionals, and factors that influence their choices. Method. Community preferences were identified by a survey of randomly selected individuals across 20 regional Australian communities. The preferences of alcohol professionals were identified by a survey of randomly selected members of the Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and Other Drugs. To identify preferred interventions and the extent of support for them, a budget allocation exercise was embedded in both surveys, asking respondents to allocate a given budget to different interventions. Tobit regression models were estimated to identify the characteristics that explain differences in intervention preferences. Results: Community respondents selected school programs most often (88.0%) and allocated it the largest proportion of funds, followed by promotion of safer drinking (71.3%), community programs (61.4%) and police enforcement of alcohol laws (60.4%). Professionals selected GP training most often (61.0%) and allocated it the largest proportion of funds, followed by school programs (36.6%), community programs (33.8%) and promotion of safer drinking (31.7%). Community views were susceptible to response bias. There were no significant predictors of professionals' preferences. Conclusions: In the absence of sufficient research evidence for effective community-based alcohol interventions, rural communities and professionals both strongly support school programs, promotion of safer drinking and community programs. Rural communities also supported police enforcement of alcohol laws and professionals supported GP training. The impact of a combination of these strategies needs to be rigorously evaluated. © 2011Shakeshaft et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

AB - Background: Given limited research evidence for community-based alcohol interventions, this study examines the intervention preferences of rural communities and alcohol professionals, and factors that influence their choices. Method. Community preferences were identified by a survey of randomly selected individuals across 20 regional Australian communities. The preferences of alcohol professionals were identified by a survey of randomly selected members of the Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and Other Drugs. To identify preferred interventions and the extent of support for them, a budget allocation exercise was embedded in both surveys, asking respondents to allocate a given budget to different interventions. Tobit regression models were estimated to identify the characteristics that explain differences in intervention preferences. Results: Community respondents selected school programs most often (88.0%) and allocated it the largest proportion of funds, followed by promotion of safer drinking (71.3%), community programs (61.4%) and police enforcement of alcohol laws (60.4%). Professionals selected GP training most often (61.0%) and allocated it the largest proportion of funds, followed by school programs (36.6%), community programs (33.8%) and promotion of safer drinking (31.7%). Community views were susceptible to response bias. There were no significant predictors of professionals' preferences. Conclusions: In the absence of sufficient research evidence for effective community-based alcohol interventions, rural communities and professionals both strongly support school programs, promotion of safer drinking and community programs. Rural communities also supported police enforcement of alcohol laws and professionals supported GP training. The impact of a combination of these strategies needs to be rigorously evaluated. © 2011Shakeshaft et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=yv4JPVwI&eid=2-s2.0-84855499389&md5=07d55dc6e9a2c956566c0343abd83ee4

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2458-12-25

DO - 10.1186/1471-2458-12-25

M1 - Article

JO - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

IS - 1

VL - 12

ER -

Documents

Library & Learning Centre

Contact | Accessibility | Policy