Discovery - University of Dundee - Online Publications

Library & Learning Centre

Clinical assessment to screen for the detection of oral cavity cancer and potentially malignant disorders in apparently healthy adults

Clinical assessment to screen for the detection of oral cavity cancer and potentially malignant disorders in apparently healthy adults

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

View graph of relations

Authors

  • Tanya Walsh
  • Joseph L. Y. Liu
  • Paul Brocklehurst
  • Mark Lingen
  • Alexander R. Kerr
  • Graham Ogden
  • Saman Warnakulasuriya
  • Crispian Scully

Research units

Info

Original languageEnglish
Article numberCD010173
Number of pages19
JournalCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Journal publication date2012
Issue11
DOIs
StatePublished

Abstract

The objective of this review is to estimate the accuracy of the conventional oral examination (COE) used singly or in combination with another index test (Additional Table 1) as a screening test for the detection of oral cancer and potentially malignant disorders (PMD) of the lip and oral cavity of apparently healthy adults.

The secondary objective of this review is to estimate the accuracy of the different tests with COE, when compared with each other.

We will use meta-regression to explore possible sources of heterogeneity, ways in which the observed diagnostic test accuracy varies according to particular characteristics. Covariates to be included in these analyses will include.
• Characteristics of the study sample: prevalence of carcinoma or PMD disease in the study (> 50% prevalence), inclusion of HPV + adults, tobacco users / high alcohol consumption.
• Target condition (oral squamous cell carcinoma alone or oral squamous cell carcinoma and PMD).
• Attributes of the screening programme: prospective organised or opportunistic, type of reference standard (examination and clinical evaluation by physician with specialist knowledge or extended follow-up), operator (dental or general practice professionals or other healthcare workers).

This review is published as a Cochrane Review in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 11. Cochrane Reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to comments and criticisms, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews should be consulted for the most recent version of the Review.

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

Links

DOI

Library & Learning Centre

Contact | Accessibility | Policy