Discovery - University of Dundee - Online Publications

Library & Learning Centre

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy

Research output: Contribution to journalScientific review

View graph of relations

Authors

  • Anne-Marie Glenny (Lead / Corresponding author)
  • Susan Furness
  • Helen V. Worthington
  • David I. Conway
  • Richard Oliver
  • Jan E. Clarkson
  • Michaelina Macluskey
  • Sue Pavitt
  • Kelvin K. W. Chan
  • Paul Brocklehurst
  • CSROC Expert Panel

Research units

Info

Original languageEnglish
Article numberCD006387
Pages-
Number of pages94
JournalCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Journal publication date2010
Volume2010
Issue12
DOIs
StatePublished

Abstract

Background

The management of advanced oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers is problematic and has traditionally relied on surgery and radiotherapy, both of which are associated with substantial adverse effects. Radiotherapy has been in use since the 1950s and has traditionally been given as single daily doses. This method of dividing up the total dose, or fractionation, has been modified over the years and a variety of approaches have been developed with the aim of improving survival whilst maintaining acceptable toxicity.

Objectives

To determine which radiotherapy regimens for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers result in increased overall survival, disease free survival, progression free survival and locoregional control.

Search strategy

The following electronic databases were searched: the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (to 28 July 2010), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3), MEDLINE via OVID (1950 to 28 July 2010) and EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 28 July 2010). There were no restrictions regarding language or date of publication.

Selection criteria

Randomised controlled trials where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours of the oral cavity or oropharynx, and which compared two or more radiotherapy regimens, radiotherapy versus other treatment modality, or the addition of radiotherapy to other treatment modalities.

Data collection and analysis

Data extraction and assessment of risk of bias was undertaken independently by two or more authors. Study authors were contacted for additional information as required. Adverse events data were collected from published trials.

Main results

30 trials involving 6535 participants were included. Seventeen trials compared some form of altered fractionation (hyperfractionation/accelerated) radiotherapy with conventional radiotherapy; three trials compared different altered fractionation regimens; one trial compared timing of radiotherapy, five trials evaluated neutron therapy and four trials evaluated the addition of pre-operative radiotherapy. Pooling trials of any altered fractionation radiotherapy compared to a conventional schedule showed a statistically significant reduction in totalmortality (hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 to 0.98). In addition, a statistically significant difference in favour of the altered fractionation was shown for the outcome of locoregional control (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.89). No statistically significant difference was shown for disease free survival.

No statistically significant difference was shown for any other comparison.

Authors' conclusions

Altered fractionation radiotherapy is associated with an improvement in overall survival and locoregional control in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. More accurate methods of reporting adverse events are needed in order to truly assess the clinical performance of different radiotherapy regimens.

This review is published as a Cochrane Review in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 12. Cochrane Reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to comments and criticisms, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews should be consulted for the most recent version of the Review.

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Publisher's Final Version

    932 KB, PDF-document

    This review is published as a Cochrane Review in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 12. Cochrane Reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to comments and criticisms, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews should be consulted for the most recent version of the Review.

Links

DOI

Library & Learning Centre

Contact | Accessibility | Policy