TY - JOUR T1 - Legal implications of mobile shorelines in Great Britain A1 - McGlashan,Derek J. A1 - Duck,Robert W. A1 - Reid,Colin T. AU - McGlashan,Derek J. AU - Duck,Robert W. AU - Reid,Colin T. PY - 2009 Y1 - 2009 N2 -
This paper highlights the three legally defined property areas that lie in the coastal zone in Great Britain (land, foreshore and seabed), and considers the mechanisms used by the two legal systems that operate on the mainland (Scots and English law) to cope with natural processes of erosion and accretion. The two legal systems are shown to be slightly different in how they accommodate erosion and accretion. However, they both have difficulty in coherently addressing the issues of coastal mobility and land ownership, which raises important questions of social justice, as they are based on the perceptions of judges in historic cases.
AB -This paper highlights the three legally defined property areas that lie in the coastal zone in Great Britain (land, foreshore and seabed), and considers the mechanisms used by the two legal systems that operate on the mainland (Scots and English law) to cope with natural processes of erosion and accretion. The two legal systems are shown to be slightly different in how they accommodate erosion and accretion. However, they both have difficulty in coherently addressing the issues of coastal mobility and land ownership, which raises important questions of social justice, as they are based on the perceptions of judges in historic cases.
KW - Coastal accretion KW - Coastal erosion KW - English law KW - Great Britain KW - Scots law KW - Social justice U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00854.x DO - 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00854.x M1 - Article JO - Area JF - Area IS - 2 VL - 41 SP - 149 EP - 156 ER -