Discovery - University of Dundee - Online Publications

Library & Learning Centre

Micrococcal Nuclease Does Not Substantially Bias Nucleosome Mapping

Micrococcal Nuclease Does Not Substantially Bias Nucleosome Mapping

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

View graph of relations

Authors

  • James Allan
  • Ross M. Fraser
  • Tom Owen-Hughes
  • David Keszenman-Pereyra

Research units

Info

Original languageEnglish
Pages152-164
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Molecular Biology
Journal publication date30 Mar 2012
Volume417
Issue3
DOIs
StatePublished

Abstract

We have mapped sequence-directed nucleosome positioning on genomic DNA molecules using high-throughput sequencing. Chromatins, prepared by reconstitution with either chicken or frog histones, were separately digested to mononucleosomes using either micrococcal nuclease (MNase) or caspase-activated DNase (CAD). Both enzymes preferentially cleave internucleosomal (linker) DNA, although they do so by markedly different mechanisms. MNase has hitherto been very widely used to map nucleosomes, although concerns have been raised over its potential to introduce bias. Having identified the locations and quantified the strength of both the chicken or frog histone octamer binding sites on each DNA, the results obtained with the two enzymes were compared using a variety of criteria. Both enzymes displayed sequence specificity in their preferred cleavage sites, although the nature of this selectivity was distinct for the two enzymes. In addition, nucleosomes produced by CAD nuclease are 8-10 bp longer than those produced with MNase, with the CAD cleavage sites tending to be 4-5 bp further out from the nucleosomal dyad than the corresponding MNase cleavage sites. Despite these notable differences in cleavage behaviour, the two nucleases identified essentially equivalent patterns of nucleosome positioning sites on each of the DNAs tested, an observation that was independent of the histone type. These results indicate that biases in nucleosome positioning data collected using MNase are, under our conditions, not significant. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Library & Learning Centre

Contact | Accessibility | Policy