Discovery - University of Dundee - Online Publications

Library & Learning Centre

Orthognathic surgery

Standard

Orthognathic surgery : Is patient information on the Internet valid?. / Aldairy, T.; Laverick, S.; McIntyre, G.T.

In: European Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 34, No. 4, 01.08.2012, p. 466-469.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Aldairy, T, Laverick, S & McIntyre, GT 2012, 'Orthognathic surgery: Is patient information on the Internet valid?' European Journal of Orthodontics, vol 34, no. 4, pp. 466-469., 10.1093/ejo/cjr046

APA

Aldairy, T., Laverick, S., & McIntyre, G. T. (2012). Orthognathic surgery: Is patient information on the Internet valid?. European Journal of Orthodontics, 34(4), 466-469. 10.1093/ejo/cjr046

Vancouver

Aldairy T, Laverick S, McIntyre GT. Orthognathic surgery: Is patient information on the Internet valid?. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2012 Aug 1;34(4):466-469. Available from: 10.1093/ejo/cjr046

Author

Aldairy, T.; Laverick, S.; McIntyre, G.T. / Orthognathic surgery : Is patient information on the Internet valid?.

In: European Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 34, No. 4, 01.08.2012, p. 466-469.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bibtex - Download

@article{dfac373414884735810491354628afe3,
title = "Orthognathic surgery: Is patient information on the Internet valid?",
author = "T. Aldairy and S. Laverick and G.T. McIntyre",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1093/ejo/cjr046",
volume = "34",
number = "4",
pages = "466--469",
journal = "European Journal of Orthodontics",
issn = "0141-5387",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Orthognathic surgery

T2 - Is patient information on the Internet valid?

A1 - Aldairy,T.

A1 - Laverick,S.

A1 - McIntyre,G.T.

AU - Aldairy,T.

AU - Laverick,S.

AU - McIntyre,G.T.

PY - 2012/8/1

Y1 - 2012/8/1

N2 - The aims of this study were to evaluate the quality and reliability of UK websites providing information on orthognathic and jaw surgery to patients. An Internet search engine (www.google.com) was used to identify websites containing medical information on ' orthognathic surgery ' and ' jaw surgery'. Of over 144 000 links for orthognathic surgery and 700 000 for jaw surgery, the first 100 were examined in detail. After excluding discussion groups, news and video feeds, and removing duplicate sites, only 25 relevant websites remained which were then evaluated using the DISCERN instrument (www.discern.org.uk/discern- instrument.php). Through the 16 questions assessing the reliability and quality of the consumer information which are scored from 1 to 5, a relative index of the quality of the information is produced. The maximum score attainable for an excellent website is 80. Of the 25 websites that were scored, DISCERN indicated the majority of websites fell well below the maximum score. The highest score achieved by one of the websites according to the DISCERN tool was 64 of 80 and the lowest score achieved was 21 of 80. The websites achieving maximum and minimum score were Wikipedia and qualitydentistry . com, respectively. By directing patients to validated websites, clinicians can ensure patients find appropriate information ; however, further development of websites relating to orthognathic surgery is required. Internet information should be updated on a regular basis to account for improvements in orthodontic and surgical care. © The Author 2011.

AB - The aims of this study were to evaluate the quality and reliability of UK websites providing information on orthognathic and jaw surgery to patients. An Internet search engine (www.google.com) was used to identify websites containing medical information on ' orthognathic surgery ' and ' jaw surgery'. Of over 144 000 links for orthognathic surgery and 700 000 for jaw surgery, the first 100 were examined in detail. After excluding discussion groups, news and video feeds, and removing duplicate sites, only 25 relevant websites remained which were then evaluated using the DISCERN instrument (www.discern.org.uk/discern- instrument.php). Through the 16 questions assessing the reliability and quality of the consumer information which are scored from 1 to 5, a relative index of the quality of the information is produced. The maximum score attainable for an excellent website is 80. Of the 25 websites that were scored, DISCERN indicated the majority of websites fell well below the maximum score. The highest score achieved by one of the websites according to the DISCERN tool was 64 of 80 and the lowest score achieved was 21 of 80. The websites achieving maximum and minimum score were Wikipedia and qualitydentistry . com, respectively. By directing patients to validated websites, clinicians can ensure patients find appropriate information ; however, further development of websites relating to orthognathic surgery is required. Internet information should be updated on a regular basis to account for improvements in orthodontic and surgical care. © The Author 2011.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864703816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ejo/cjr046

DO - 10.1093/ejo/cjr046

M1 - Article

JO - European Journal of Orthodontics

JF - European Journal of Orthodontics

SN - 0141-5387

IS - 4

VL - 34

SP - 466

EP - 469

ER -

Documents

Library & Learning Centre

Contact | Accessibility | Policy