Discovery - University of Dundee - Online Publications

Library & Learning Centre

Representing and classifying arguments on the Semantic Web

Representing and classifying arguments on the Semantic Web

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

View graph of relations

Authors

  • Iyad Rahwan
  • Bita Banihashemi
  • Chris Reed
  • Douglas Walton
  • Sherief Abdallah

Research units

Info

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)487-511
Number of pages25
JournalKnowledge Engineering Review
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2011

Abstract

Until recently, little work has been dedicated to the representation and interchange of informal, semi-structured arguments of the type found in natural language prose and dialogue. To redress this, the research community recently initiated work towards an Argument Interchange Format (AIF). The AIF aims to facilitate the exchange of semi-structured arguments among different argument analysis and argumentation-support tools. In this paper, we present a Description Logic ontology for annotating arguments, based on a new reification of the AIF and founded in Walton's theory of argumentation schemes. We demonstrate how this ontology enables a new kind of automated reasoning over argument structures, which complements classical reasoning about argument acceptability. In particular, Web Ontology Language reasoning enables significantly enhanced querying of arguments through automatic scheme classifications, instance classification, inference of indirect support in chained argument structures, and inference of critical questions. We present the implementation of a pilot Web-based system for authoring and querying argument structures using the proposed ontology.

Documents

DOI

Library & Learning Centre

Contact | Accessibility | Policy