Discovery - University of Dundee - Online Publications

Library & Learning Centre

Supporting 'work-related goals' rather than 'return to work' after cancer?

Supporting 'work-related goals' rather than 'return to work' after cancer?: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of 25 qualitative studies

Research output: Contribution to journalScientific review

View graph of relations

Authors

  • Mary Wells (Lead / Corresponding author)
  • Brian Williams
  • Danielle Firnigl
  • Heidi Lang
  • Joanne Coyle
  • Thilo Kroll
  • Steve MacGillivray

Research units

Info

Original languageEnglish
Pages1208-1219
Number of pages12
JournalPsycho-Oncology
Journal publication dateJun 2013
Volume22
Issue6
DOIs
StatePublished

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to systematically review and synthesise qualitative studies of employment and cancer. Methods: A rigorous systematic review and meta-synthesis process was followed. A total of 13233 papers were retrieved from eight databases; 69 were deemed relevant following title and abstract appraisal. Four further publications were identified via contact with key authors. Screening of full texts resulted in the retention of 25 publications from six countries, which were included in the synthesis. Results: Studies consistently indicate that for people with cancer, 'work' forms a central basis for self-identity and self-esteem, provides financial security, forms and maintains social relationships, and represents an individual's abilities, talents and health. Work is therefore more than paid employment. Its importance to individuals rests on the relative value survivors place on these constituent functions. The desirability, importance and subsequent interpretation of individuals' experience of 'return to work' appears to be influenced by the ways in which cancer affects these functions or goals of 'work'. Our synthesis draws these complex elements into a heuristic model to help illustrate and communicate these inter-relationships. Conclusion: The concept of 'return to work' may be overly simplistic, and as a result, misleading. The proposed benefits previously ascribed to 'return to work' may only be achieved through consideration of the specific meaning and role of work to the individual. Interventions to address work-related issues need to be person-centred, acknowledging the work-related outcomes that are important to the individual. A conceptual and operational shift towards supporting survivors to identify and achieve their 'work-related goals' may be more appropriate. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Documents

Library & Learning Centre

Contact | Accessibility | Policy