Discovery - University of Dundee - Online Publications

Library & Learning Centre

Telehealthcare for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Telehealthcare for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

View graph of relations

Authors

  • Susannah McLean
  • Ulugbek Nurmatov
  • Joseph L. Y. Liu
  • Claudia Pagliari
  • Josip Car
  • Aziz Sheikh

Research units

Info

Original languageEnglish
Article numberCD007718
Pages1-51
Number of pages51
JournalCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Journal publication dateAug 2012
Issue8
DOIs
StatePublished

Abstract

Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a disease of irreversible airways obstruction in which patients often suffer exacerbations. Sometimes these exacerbations need hospital care: telehealthcare has the potential to reduce admission to hospital when used to administer care to the patient from within their own home.

Objectives

To review the effectiveness of telehealthcare for COPD compared with usual face-to-face care.

Search strategy

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register, which is derived from systematic searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, and PsycINFO; last searched January 2010. Selection criteria We selected randomised controlled trials which assessed telehealthcare, defined as follows: healthcare at a distance, involving the communication of data from the patient to the health carer, usually a doctor or nurse, who then processes the information and responds with feedback regarding the management of the illness. The primary outcomes considered were: number of exacerbations, quality of life as recorded by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, hospitalisations, emergency department visits and deaths.

Data collection and analysis

Two authors independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted data. We combined data into forest plots using fixed-effects modelling as heterogeneity was low (I-2 < 40%).

Main results

Ten trials met the inclusion criteria. Telehealthcare was assessed as part of a complex intervention, including nurse case management and other interventions. Telehealthcare was associated with a clinically significant increase in quality of life in two trials with 253 participants (mean difference -6.57 (95% confidence interval (CI) -13.62 to 0.48); minimum clinically significant difference is a change of -4.0), but the confidence interval was wide. Telehealthcare showed a significant reduction in the number of patients with one or more emergency department attendances over 12 months; odds ratio (OR) 0.27 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.66) in three trials with 449 participants, and the OR of having one or more admissions to hospital over 12 months was 0.46 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.65) in six trials with 604 participants. There was no significant difference in the OR for deaths over 12 months for the telehealthcare group as compared to the usual care group in three trials with 503 participants; OR 1.05 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.75).

Authors' conclusions

Telehealthcare in COPD appears to have a possible impact on the quality of life of patients and the number of times patients attend the emergency department and the hospital. However, further research is needed to clarify precisely its role since the trials included telehealthcare as part of more complex packages.

This review is published as a Cochrane Review in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 8. Cochrane Reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to comments and criticisms, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews should be consulted for the most recent version of the Review

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Telehealthcare for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    673 KB, PDF-document

    This review is published as a Cochrane Review in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 8. Cochrane Reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to comments and criticisms, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews should be consulted for the most recent version of the Review

DOI

Library & Learning Centre

Contact | Accessibility | Policy