Discovery - University of Dundee - Online Publications

Library & Learning Centre

Viewpoint

Standard

Viewpoint : empowering communities with situated voting devices. / Taylor, Nick; Marshall, Justin; Blum-Ross, Alicia; Mills, John; Rogers, Jon; Egglestone, Paul; Frohlich, David M.; Wright, Peter; Olivier, Patrick.

CHI'12: proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . New York : Association for Computing Machinery, 2012. p. 1361-1370.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Harvard

Taylor, N, Marshall, J, Blum-Ross, A, Mills, J, Rogers, J, Egglestone, P, Frohlich, DM, Wright, P & Olivier, P 2012, 'Viewpoint: empowering communities with situated voting devices'. in CHI'12: proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp. 1361-1370, CHI 2012 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Austin, Texas, United States, 5-10 May.

APA

Taylor, N., Marshall, J., Blum-Ross, A., Mills, J., Rogers, J., Egglestone, P., Frohlich, D. M., Wright, P., & Olivier, P. (2012). Viewpoint: empowering communities with situated voting devices. In CHI'12. (pp. 1361-1370). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. doi: 10.1145/2207676.2208594

Vancouver

Taylor N, Marshall J, Blum-Ross A, Mills J, Rogers J, Egglestone P et al. Viewpoint: empowering communities with situated voting devices. In CHI'12: proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . New York: Association for Computing Machinery. 2012. p. 1361-1370.

Author

Taylor, Nick; Marshall, Justin; Blum-Ross, Alicia; Mills, John; Rogers, Jon; Egglestone, Paul; Frohlich, David M.; Wright, Peter; Olivier, Patrick / Viewpoint : empowering communities with situated voting devices.

CHI'12: proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . New York : Association for Computing Machinery, 2012. p. 1361-1370.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Bibtex - Download

@inbook{9749d21ad4154d9eb96530dc4429db0b,
title = "Viewpoint",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery",
author = "Nick Taylor and Justin Marshall and Alicia Blum-Ross and John Mills and Jon Rogers and Paul Egglestone and Frohlich, {David M.} and Peter Wright and Patrick Olivier",
year = "2012",
isbn = "978-1-4503-1015-4",
pages = "1361-1370",
booktitle = "CHI'12",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - CHAP

T1 - Viewpoint

T2 - CHI'12

A1 - Taylor,Nick

A1 - Marshall,Justin

A1 - Blum-Ross,Alicia

A1 - Mills,John

A1 - Rogers,Jon

A1 - Egglestone,Paul

A1 - Frohlich,David M.

A1 - Wright,Peter

A1 - Olivier,Patrick

AU - Taylor,Nick

AU - Marshall,Justin

AU - Blum-Ross,Alicia

AU - Mills,John

AU - Rogers,Jon

AU - Egglestone,Paul

AU - Frohlich,David M.

AU - Wright,Peter

AU - Olivier,Patrick

PB - Association for Computing Machinery

CY - New York

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Viewpoint is a public voting device developed to allow residents in a disadvantaged community to make their voices heard through a simple, lightweight interaction. This was intended to open a new channel of communication within the community and increase community members' perception of their own efficacy. Local elected officials and community groups were able to post questions on devices located in public spaces, where residents could vote for one of two responses. Question authors were subsequently required to post a response indicating any actions to be taken. Following a two-month trial, we present our experiences and contribute guidelines for the design of public democracy tools and dimensions impacting their effectiveness, including credibility, efficacy and format. Copyright 2012 ACM.

AB - Viewpoint is a public voting device developed to allow residents in a disadvantaged community to make their voices heard through a simple, lightweight interaction. This was intended to open a new channel of communication within the community and increase community members' perception of their own efficacy. Local elected officials and community groups were able to post questions on devices located in public spaces, where residents could vote for one of two responses. Question authors were subsequently required to post a response indicating any actions to be taken. Following a two-month trial, we present our experiences and contribute guidelines for the design of public democracy tools and dimensions impacting their effectiveness, including credibility, efficacy and format. Copyright 2012 ACM.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=yv4JPVwI&eid=2-s2.0-84862062688&md5=d6dd525368870668f8ffad60714e7e0e

U2 - 10.1145/2207676.2208594

DO - 10.1145/2207676.2208594

M1 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-1-4503-1015-4

BT - CHI'12

SP - 1361

EP - 1370

ER -

Documents

Library & Learning Centre

Contact | Accessibility | Policy