Description
Journals and funding agencies rely on peer-reviews of papers and applications and therefore constructive peer-review plays a vital role in the quality control of the scientific process. Peer-reviewing is a key activity within and for the scientific community and it is an element in all models for developing quality control in science. Conducting peer-reviews well and efficiently is therefore a key skill for any researcher and participation in it (appropriate to career stage) is expected for career development.The webinar starts by presenting the general editorial processes and the production of a manuscript. Based on this will be described how the review(er) fits in. Next we will discuss the practicalities of performing a review, for example when to accept a manuscript for review; key elements of a review; and how to formulate a recommendation. We will end with suggestions on how to evidence your activity. Throughout, examples will be used to illustrate good reviewing practice and ample time for discussion and questions will be reserved.
| Period | 22 Feb 2018 |
|---|
Documents & Links
Related content
-
Activity
-
A brief introduction to constructive peer-review
Activity: Talk or presentation types › Invited talk
-
Quality of Life Research (Journal)
Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work types › Editorial activity
-
Peer Review in Quality of Life
Activity: Talk or presentation types › Invited talk