Projects per year
Personal profile
Research
My research is aimed at understanding how people comprehend and produce language. An important part of my research involves the investigation of how people process the syntactic structure of sentences (e.g., Van Gompel, 2013). Perhaps surprisingly, our research (Van Gompel, Pickering, & Traxler, 2001; Van Gompel, Pickering, Pearson, & Liversedge, 2005) suggests that sentences that are syntactically ambiguous are often easier to read than sentences that are disambiguated. This provides evidence against the commonly held view that different syntactic analyses of an ambiguous structure compete. Instead, the results suggest that difficulty is due to structural reanalysis.
In other research, we have investigated how the processing of sentences is affected by recent exposure to sentences with a very similar structure, a phenomenon often referred to as structural priming (Arai, Van Gompel, & Scheepers, 2007; Carminati, Van Gompel, Scheepers, & Arai, 2008). It appears that structural priming in language comprehension occurs with the same structures as in language production, but interestingly, priming effects in comprehension are much more lexically driven. In research with Leila Kantola (Kantola & Van Gompel, 2011), we have also used structural priming to investigate the syntactic representations of bilinguals: Our results show that structures that exist in two different languages have one single mental representation.
Another important part of my research is concerned with how people comprehend anaphoric expressions (e.g., Järvikivi, Van Gompel, Hyönä, & Bertram, 2005; Van Gompel & Majid, 2004) and produce them. In collaboration with Kumiko Fukumura, we have recently investigated when people produce either a pronoun or a repeated name or noun phrase to refer back to an earlier introduced discourse entity. Our results show that the choice for a particular anaphoric expression is driven by, amongst others, the similarity of a discourse entity to other entities (Fukumura & Van Gompel, in press; Fukumura, Van Gompel, Harley, & Pickering, in press) and syntactic factors, but interestingly, not by the likelihood that people refer to an entity (Fukumura & Van Gompel, 2010). I am currently also collaborating with computational linguists to test the psychological plausibility of computational models of reference, and we have edited a special issue of the journal TopiCS in Cognitive Science on this issue (Van Deemter, Gatt, Van Gompel, & Krahmer, 2012).
Teaching
I currently teach Psychology of Language (Levels 3, 4 and 5) and Statistics and Methodology (Levels 2 and 5).
Keywords
- BF Psychology
Fingerprint
- 1 Similar Profiles
Network
-
Standard Research Transition Standard Competition DTG (Student Ms Katja Suckow)
Macdonald, M., Murray, W., Smith, F., Vincent, B. & van Gompel, R.
Economic and Social Research Council
1/04/11 → 30/09/14
Project: Research
Research output
-
No looking back: The effects of visual cues on the lexical boost in structural priming
van Gompel, R., Wakeford, L. & Kantola, L., 9 Feb 2022, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. 10 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile6 Downloads (Pure) -
Lexically-independent representation of the monotransitive structure
Arai, M. & van Gompel, R. P. G., 9 Nov 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile23 Downloads (Pure) -
An investigation into the lexical boost with nonhead nouns
Carminati, M. N., van Gompel, R. P. G. & Wakeford, L. J., Oct 2019, In: Journal of Memory and Language. 108, p. 1-19 19 p., 104031.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile6 Citations (Scopus)115 Downloads (Pure) -
Conceptualisation in reference production: Probabilistic modelling and experimental testing
van-Gompel, R., van Deemter, K., Gatt, A., Snoeren, R. & Krahmer, E., Apr 2019, In: Psychological Review. 126, 3, p. 345-373Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile275 Downloads (Pure) -
Conceptualization in reference production: Probabilistic modeling and experimental testing
van Gompel, R. P. G., van Deemter, K., Gatt, A., Snoeren, R. & Krahmer, E. J., Apr 2019, In: Psychological Review. 126, 3, p. 345-373 29 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile13 Citations (Scopus)249 Downloads (Pure)
-
The lexical boost effectin structural priming: Evidence for head-centred syntactic representations
Roger van Gompel (Speaker)
28 Jun 2021Activity: Talk or presentation types › Invited talk
-
The role of discriminatory power in reference production
Roger van Gompel (Speaker)
3 Sep 2021Activity: Talk or presentation types › Oral presentation
-
What to Talk About, and How: Studies on Prominence and Patterns of Coreference
Roger van Gompel (Examiner)
19 Mar 2021Activity: Examination types › Examination
-
Phonological, lexical, and discourse effects on the production of sentence structure: evidence from structural priming
Roger van Gompel (Examiner)
17 Feb 2021Activity: Examination types › Examination
-
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition (Journal)
Roger van Gompel (Editorial board member)
1 Jan 2014 → …Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work types › Editorial activity