• 895 Citations
  • 19 h-Index
19982020
If you made any changes in Pure these will be visible here soon.

Personal profile

Research

My research is aimed at understanding how people comprehend and produce language. An important part of my research involves the investigation of how people process the syntactic structure of sentences (e.g., Van Gompel, 2013). Perhaps surprisingly, our research (Van Gompel, Pickering, & Traxler, 2001; Van Gompel, Pickering, Pearson, & Liversedge, 2005) suggests that sentences that are syntactically ambiguous are often easier to read than sentences that are disambiguated. This provides evidence against the commonly held view that different syntactic analyses of an ambiguous structure compete. Instead, the results suggest that difficulty is due to structural reanalysis.

In other research, we have investigated how the processing of sentences is affected by recent exposure to sentences with a very similar structure, a phenomenon often referred to as structural priming (Arai, Van Gompel, & Scheepers, 2007; Carminati, Van Gompel, Scheepers, & Arai, 2008). It appears that structural priming in language comprehension occurs with the same structures as in language production, but interestingly, priming effects in comprehension are much more lexically driven. In research with Leila Kantola (Kantola & Van Gompel, 2011), we have also used structural priming to investigate the syntactic representations of bilinguals: Our results show that structures that exist in two different languages have one single mental representation.

Another important part of my research is concerned with how people comprehend anaphoric expressions (e.g., Järvikivi, Van Gompel, Hyönä, & Bertram, 2005; Van Gompel & Majid, 2004) and produce them. In collaboration with Kumiko Fukumura, we have recently investigated when people produce either a pronoun or a repeated name or noun phrase to refer back to an earlier introduced discourse entity. Our results show that the choice for a particular anaphoric expression is driven by, amongst others, the similarity of a discourse entity to other entities (Fukumura & Van Gompel, in press; Fukumura, Van Gompel, Harley, & Pickering, in press) and syntactic factors, but interestingly, not by the likelihood that people refer to an entity (Fukumura & Van Gompel, 2010). I am currently also collaborating with computational linguists to test the psychological plausibility of computational models of reference, and we have edited a special issue of the journal TopiCS in Cognitive Science on this issue (Van Deemter, Gatt, Van Gompel, & Krahmer, 2012).

Teaching

I currently teach Psychology of Language (Levels 3, 4 and 5) and Statistics and Methodology (Levels 2 and 5).

Keywords

  • BF Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics where Roger van Gompel is active. These topic labels come from the works of this person. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • 8 Similar Profiles
experiment Social Sciences
Reading Medicine & Life Sciences
Semantics Medicine & Life Sciences
Psycholinguistics Medicine & Life Sciences
Linguistics Medicine & Life Sciences
Eye Movements Medicine & Life Sciences
Language Medicine & Life Sciences
evidence Social Sciences

Network Recent external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Projects 2017 2020

Research Output 1998 2019

An investigation into the lexical boost with nonhead nouns

Carminati, M. N., van Gompel, R. P. G. & Wakeford, L. J., 9 Jul 2019, In : Journal of Memory and Language. 108, p. 1-19 19 p., 104031.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Head
experiment
Experiments
Licensure
Syntactics

Conceptualisation in reference production: Probabilistic modelling and experimental testing

van-Gompel, R., van Deemter, K., Gatt, A., Snoeren, R. & Krahmer, E., Apr 2019, In : Psychological Review. 126, 3, p. 345-373

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Open Access
File
Color
Psycholinguistics
Language
Research
50 Downloads (Pure)

Conceptualization in reference production: Probabilistic modeling and experimental testing

van Gompel, R. P. G., van Deemter, K., Gatt, A., Snoeren, R. & Krahmer, E. J., Apr 2019, In : Psychological Review. 126, 3, p. 345-373 29 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Open Access
File
Color
Psycholinguistics
Language
Artificial Intelligence
Research
57 Downloads (Pure)

Number attraction affects reanalysis in sentence processing

Suckow, K. & van Gompel, R. P. G., 2 Jan 2018, In : Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. 33, 1, p. 1-11 11 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Open Access
File
experiment
Linguistics
Reading
comprehension
linguistics
2 Citations (Scopus)
73 Downloads (Pure)

How do violations of Gricean maxims affect reading?

Fukumura, K. & van-Gompel, R. P. G., 2017, In : Journal of Memory and Language. 95, p. 1-18 18 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Open Access
File
Reading
experiment
redundancy
Redundancy
Experiments

Thesis

Number interference in sentence processing

Author: Suckow, K., 2014

Supervisor: van-Gompel, R. (Supervisor)

Student thesis: Doctoral ThesisDoctor of Philosophy

File

The role of the native language in second-language syntactic processing

Author: Jacob, G., 2009

Supervisor: van-Gompel, R. (Supervisor) & Murray, W. (Supervisor)

Student thesis: Doctoral ThesisDoctor of Philosophy

File