A cost-benefit analysis of afforestation as a climate change adaptation measure to reduce flood risk

Ruth Dittrich (Lead / Corresponding author), Tom Ball, Anita Wreford, Dominic Moran, Chris J. Spray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Increased river flood frequency is considered a major risk under climate change. Protecting vulnerable communities is, therefore, a key public policy objective. Natural flood management measures (NFM)—notably re-afforestation on hillslope and floodplain—are increasingly discussed as cost-effective means for providing flood regulation, particularly when considering ecosystem services other than flood regulation. However, studies that place flood benefits alongside other benefits are rare, potentially causing uncertainty in policy decision-making. This paper provides a cost-benefit analysis of the impacts of afforestation on peak river flows under UKCP09 climate change projections, and on additional ecosystem services in a rural catchment in Scotland. We find significant positive net present values (NPV) for all alternatives considered. However, benefits are dominated by ecosystem services other than flood regulation, with values related to climate regulation, aesthetic appeal, recreation and water quality contributing to a high positive NPV. The investment in riparian woodland (under low and central climate change scenarios) delivers a positive NPV alone when considering flood regulation benefits only. The case study suggests that afforestation as a sole NFM measure provides a positive NPV only in some cases but highlights the importance of identifying and quantifying additional ecosystem co-benefits.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12482
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Flood Risk Management
Volume12
Issue number4
Early online date12 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Cost benefit analysis
cost-benefit analysis
afforestation
Climate change
natural disaster
climate change
Ecosystems
ecosystem service
regulation
present
Rivers
river
flood frequency
peak flow
climate change adaptation
hillslope
esthetics
river flow
recreation
management

Keywords

  • afforestation
  • climate change
  • cost-benefit-analysis
  • natural flood risk management

Cite this

Dittrich, Ruth ; Ball, Tom ; Wreford, Anita ; Moran, Dominic ; Spray, Chris J. / A cost-benefit analysis of afforestation as a climate change adaptation measure to reduce flood risk. In: Journal of Flood Risk Management. 2019 ; Vol. 12, No. 4. pp. 1-11.
@article{9a24f32609424f2ea538d142937ec993,
title = "A cost-benefit analysis of afforestation as a climate change adaptation measure to reduce flood risk",
abstract = "Increased river flood frequency is considered a major risk under climate change. Protecting vulnerable communities is, therefore, a key public policy objective. Natural flood management measures (NFM)—notably re-afforestation on hillslope and floodplain—are increasingly discussed as cost-effective means for providing flood regulation, particularly when considering ecosystem services other than flood regulation. However, studies that place flood benefits alongside other benefits are rare, potentially causing uncertainty in policy decision-making. This paper provides a cost-benefit analysis of the impacts of afforestation on peak river flows under UKCP09 climate change projections, and on additional ecosystem services in a rural catchment in Scotland. We find significant positive net present values (NPV) for all alternatives considered. However, benefits are dominated by ecosystem services other than flood regulation, with values related to climate regulation, aesthetic appeal, recreation and water quality contributing to a high positive NPV. The investment in riparian woodland (under low and central climate change scenarios) delivers a positive NPV alone when considering flood regulation benefits only. The case study suggests that afforestation as a sole NFM measure provides a positive NPV only in some cases but highlights the importance of identifying and quantifying additional ecosystem co-benefits.",
keywords = "afforestation, climate change, cost-benefit-analysis, natural flood risk management",
author = "Ruth Dittrich and Tom Ball and Anita Wreford and Dominic Moran and Spray, {Chris J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/jfr3.12482",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Journal of Flood Risk Management",
issn = "1753-318X",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "4",

}

A cost-benefit analysis of afforestation as a climate change adaptation measure to reduce flood risk. / Dittrich, Ruth (Lead / Corresponding author); Ball, Tom; Wreford, Anita; Moran, Dominic; Spray, Chris J.

In: Journal of Flood Risk Management, Vol. 12, No. 4, e12482, 12.2019, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cost-benefit analysis of afforestation as a climate change adaptation measure to reduce flood risk

AU - Dittrich, Ruth

AU - Ball, Tom

AU - Wreford, Anita

AU - Moran, Dominic

AU - Spray, Chris J.

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - Increased river flood frequency is considered a major risk under climate change. Protecting vulnerable communities is, therefore, a key public policy objective. Natural flood management measures (NFM)—notably re-afforestation on hillslope and floodplain—are increasingly discussed as cost-effective means for providing flood regulation, particularly when considering ecosystem services other than flood regulation. However, studies that place flood benefits alongside other benefits are rare, potentially causing uncertainty in policy decision-making. This paper provides a cost-benefit analysis of the impacts of afforestation on peak river flows under UKCP09 climate change projections, and on additional ecosystem services in a rural catchment in Scotland. We find significant positive net present values (NPV) for all alternatives considered. However, benefits are dominated by ecosystem services other than flood regulation, with values related to climate regulation, aesthetic appeal, recreation and water quality contributing to a high positive NPV. The investment in riparian woodland (under low and central climate change scenarios) delivers a positive NPV alone when considering flood regulation benefits only. The case study suggests that afforestation as a sole NFM measure provides a positive NPV only in some cases but highlights the importance of identifying and quantifying additional ecosystem co-benefits.

AB - Increased river flood frequency is considered a major risk under climate change. Protecting vulnerable communities is, therefore, a key public policy objective. Natural flood management measures (NFM)—notably re-afforestation on hillslope and floodplain—are increasingly discussed as cost-effective means for providing flood regulation, particularly when considering ecosystem services other than flood regulation. However, studies that place flood benefits alongside other benefits are rare, potentially causing uncertainty in policy decision-making. This paper provides a cost-benefit analysis of the impacts of afforestation on peak river flows under UKCP09 climate change projections, and on additional ecosystem services in a rural catchment in Scotland. We find significant positive net present values (NPV) for all alternatives considered. However, benefits are dominated by ecosystem services other than flood regulation, with values related to climate regulation, aesthetic appeal, recreation and water quality contributing to a high positive NPV. The investment in riparian woodland (under low and central climate change scenarios) delivers a positive NPV alone when considering flood regulation benefits only. The case study suggests that afforestation as a sole NFM measure provides a positive NPV only in some cases but highlights the importance of identifying and quantifying additional ecosystem co-benefits.

KW - afforestation

KW - climate change

KW - cost-benefit-analysis

KW - natural flood risk management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074823514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jfr3.12482

DO - 10.1111/jfr3.12482

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074823514

VL - 12

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Journal of Flood Risk Management

JF - Journal of Flood Risk Management

SN - 1753-318X

IS - 4

M1 - e12482

ER -