A Critical Discussion Game for Prohibiting Fallacies

Jacky Visser (Lead / Corresponding author), Katarzyna Budzynska, Chris Reed

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

95 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The study of fallacies is at the heart of argumentation studies. In response to Hamblin’s devastating critique of the state of the theory of fallacies in 1970, both formal dialectical and informal approaches to fallacies developed. In the current paper, we focus on an influential informal approach to fallacies, part of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Central to the pragma-dialectical method for analysing and evaluating argumentative discourse is the ideal model of a critical discussion. In this discussion model, a dialectical perspective on argumentation is combined with a pragmatic take on communicative interaction. By formalising and computationally implementing the model of a critical discussion, we take a first step in the development of software to computationally model argumentative dialogue in which fallacies are prohibited along the pragma-dialectical norms. We do this by defining the Critical Discussion Game, a formal dialogue game based on the pragma-dialectical discussion model, executable on an online user-interface which is part of a larger infrastructure of argumentation software.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)491-515
Number of pages25
JournalLogic and Logical Philosophy
Volume27
Issue number4
Early online date26 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018

Fingerprint

Fallacies
Critical Discussion
Argumentation
Software
Interaction
Argumentative Discourse
User Interface
Argumentation Theory

Keywords

  • Argument Web
  • Argumentation
  • Critical discussion
  • Dialogue Game Description Language
  • Fallacies
  • Formal dialectics
  • Pragma-dialectics

Cite this

@article{230d41cd9c924e93b262bbc10abf23e2,
title = "A Critical Discussion Game for Prohibiting Fallacies",
abstract = "The study of fallacies is at the heart of argumentation studies. In response to Hamblin’s devastating critique of the state of the theory of fallacies in 1970, both formal dialectical and informal approaches to fallacies developed. In the current paper, we focus on an influential informal approach to fallacies, part of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Central to the pragma-dialectical method for analysing and evaluating argumentative discourse is the ideal model of a critical discussion. In this discussion model, a dialectical perspective on argumentation is combined with a pragmatic take on communicative interaction. By formalising and computationally implementing the model of a critical discussion, we take a first step in the development of software to computationally model argumentative dialogue in which fallacies are prohibited along the pragma-dialectical norms. We do this by defining the Critical Discussion Game, a formal dialogue game based on the pragma-dialectical discussion model, executable on an online user-interface which is part of a larger infrastructure of argumentation software.",
keywords = "Argument Web, Argumentation, Critical discussion, Dialogue Game Description Language, Fallacies, Formal dialectics, Pragma-dialectics",
author = "Jacky Visser and Katarzyna Budzynska and Chris Reed",
note = "The work reported in this paper has been supported in part by the EPSRC in the UK under grant EP/N014871/1 and in part by the Polish National Science Centre under grant 2015/18/M/HS1/00620.",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
doi = "10.12775/LLP.2017.021",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "491--515",
journal = "Logic and Logical Philosophy",
issn = "1425-3305",
publisher = "Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu",
number = "4",

}

A Critical Discussion Game for Prohibiting Fallacies. / Visser, Jacky (Lead / Corresponding author); Budzynska, Katarzyna; Reed, Chris.

In: Logic and Logical Philosophy, Vol. 27, No. 4, 12.2018, p. 491-515.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Critical Discussion Game for Prohibiting Fallacies

AU - Visser, Jacky

AU - Budzynska, Katarzyna

AU - Reed, Chris

N1 - The work reported in this paper has been supported in part by the EPSRC in the UK under grant EP/N014871/1 and in part by the Polish National Science Centre under grant 2015/18/M/HS1/00620.

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - The study of fallacies is at the heart of argumentation studies. In response to Hamblin’s devastating critique of the state of the theory of fallacies in 1970, both formal dialectical and informal approaches to fallacies developed. In the current paper, we focus on an influential informal approach to fallacies, part of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Central to the pragma-dialectical method for analysing and evaluating argumentative discourse is the ideal model of a critical discussion. In this discussion model, a dialectical perspective on argumentation is combined with a pragmatic take on communicative interaction. By formalising and computationally implementing the model of a critical discussion, we take a first step in the development of software to computationally model argumentative dialogue in which fallacies are prohibited along the pragma-dialectical norms. We do this by defining the Critical Discussion Game, a formal dialogue game based on the pragma-dialectical discussion model, executable on an online user-interface which is part of a larger infrastructure of argumentation software.

AB - The study of fallacies is at the heart of argumentation studies. In response to Hamblin’s devastating critique of the state of the theory of fallacies in 1970, both formal dialectical and informal approaches to fallacies developed. In the current paper, we focus on an influential informal approach to fallacies, part of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Central to the pragma-dialectical method for analysing and evaluating argumentative discourse is the ideal model of a critical discussion. In this discussion model, a dialectical perspective on argumentation is combined with a pragmatic take on communicative interaction. By formalising and computationally implementing the model of a critical discussion, we take a first step in the development of software to computationally model argumentative dialogue in which fallacies are prohibited along the pragma-dialectical norms. We do this by defining the Critical Discussion Game, a formal dialogue game based on the pragma-dialectical discussion model, executable on an online user-interface which is part of a larger infrastructure of argumentation software.

KW - Argument Web

KW - Argumentation

KW - Critical discussion

KW - Dialogue Game Description Language

KW - Fallacies

KW - Formal dialectics

KW - Pragma-dialectics

U2 - 10.12775/LLP.2017.021

DO - 10.12775/LLP.2017.021

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 491

EP - 515

JO - Logic and Logical Philosophy

JF - Logic and Logical Philosophy

SN - 1425-3305

IS - 4

ER -