A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97

Elizabeth Mitchell, Frank Sullivan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    217 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objectives: To appraise findings from studies examining the impact of computers on primary care consultations. Design: Systematic review of world literature from 1980 to 1997. Data sources: 5475 references were identified from electronic databases (Medline, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Index of Scientific and Technical Proceedings, Embase, OCLC FirstSearch Proceedings), bibliographies, books, identified articles, and by authors active in the field. 1892 eligible abstracts were independently rated, and 89 studies met the inclusion criteria. Main outcome measures: Effect on doctors' performance and patient outcomes; attitudes towards computerisation. Results: 61 studies examined effects of computers on practitioners' performance, 17 evaluated their impact on patient outcome, and 20 studied practitioners' or patients' attitudes. Computer use during consultations lengthened the consultation. Reminder systems for preventive tasks and disease management improved process rates, although some returned to pre-intervention levels when reminders were stopped. Use of computers for issuing prescriptions increased prescribing of generic drugs, and use of computers for test ordering led to cost savings and fewer unnecessary tests. There were no negative effects on those patient outcomes evaluated. Doctors and patients were generally positive about use of computers, but issues of concern included their impact on privacy, the doctor-patient relationship, cost, time, and training needs. Conclusions: Primary care computing systems can improve practitioner performance, particularly for health promotion interventions. This may be at the expense of patient initiated activities, making many practitioners suspicious of the negative impact on relationships with patients. There remains a dearth of evidence evaluating effects on patient outcomes.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)279-282
    Number of pages4
    JournalBMJ
    Volume322
    Issue number7281
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2001

    Fingerprint

    Starvation
    Primary Health Care
    Referral and Consultation
    Reminder Systems
    Generic Drugs
    Social Sciences
    Cost Savings
    Privacy
    Information Storage and Retrieval
    Bibliography
    Disease Management
    Health Promotion
    Prescriptions
    Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
    Databases
    Costs and Cost Analysis

    Cite this

    Mitchell, Elizabeth ; Sullivan, Frank. / A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97. In: BMJ. 2001 ; Vol. 322, No. 7281. pp. 279-282.
    @article{a45a311db72a46f28bd9dca0c7439602,
    title = "A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97",
    abstract = "Objectives: To appraise findings from studies examining the impact of computers on primary care consultations. Design: Systematic review of world literature from 1980 to 1997. Data sources: 5475 references were identified from electronic databases (Medline, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Index of Scientific and Technical Proceedings, Embase, OCLC FirstSearch Proceedings), bibliographies, books, identified articles, and by authors active in the field. 1892 eligible abstracts were independently rated, and 89 studies met the inclusion criteria. Main outcome measures: Effect on doctors' performance and patient outcomes; attitudes towards computerisation. Results: 61 studies examined effects of computers on practitioners' performance, 17 evaluated their impact on patient outcome, and 20 studied practitioners' or patients' attitudes. Computer use during consultations lengthened the consultation. Reminder systems for preventive tasks and disease management improved process rates, although some returned to pre-intervention levels when reminders were stopped. Use of computers for issuing prescriptions increased prescribing of generic drugs, and use of computers for test ordering led to cost savings and fewer unnecessary tests. There were no negative effects on those patient outcomes evaluated. Doctors and patients were generally positive about use of computers, but issues of concern included their impact on privacy, the doctor-patient relationship, cost, time, and training needs. Conclusions: Primary care computing systems can improve practitioner performance, particularly for health promotion interventions. This may be at the expense of patient initiated activities, making many practitioners suspicious of the negative impact on relationships with patients. There remains a dearth of evidence evaluating effects on patient outcomes.",
    author = "Elizabeth Mitchell and Frank Sullivan",
    note = "dc.publisher: BMJ Publishing Group dc.description.sponsorship: Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Executive Health Department K/OPR/2/2D300",
    year = "2001",
    month = "2",
    doi = "10.1136/bmj.322.7281.279",
    language = "English",
    volume = "322",
    pages = "279--282",
    journal = "British Medical Journal",
    issn = "0959-8146",
    publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group Ltd",
    number = "7281",

    }

    A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97. / Mitchell, Elizabeth; Sullivan, Frank.

    In: BMJ, Vol. 322, No. 7281, 02.2001, p. 279-282.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97

    AU - Mitchell, Elizabeth

    AU - Sullivan, Frank

    N1 - dc.publisher: BMJ Publishing Group dc.description.sponsorship: Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Executive Health Department K/OPR/2/2D300

    PY - 2001/2

    Y1 - 2001/2

    N2 - Objectives: To appraise findings from studies examining the impact of computers on primary care consultations. Design: Systematic review of world literature from 1980 to 1997. Data sources: 5475 references were identified from electronic databases (Medline, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Index of Scientific and Technical Proceedings, Embase, OCLC FirstSearch Proceedings), bibliographies, books, identified articles, and by authors active in the field. 1892 eligible abstracts were independently rated, and 89 studies met the inclusion criteria. Main outcome measures: Effect on doctors' performance and patient outcomes; attitudes towards computerisation. Results: 61 studies examined effects of computers on practitioners' performance, 17 evaluated their impact on patient outcome, and 20 studied practitioners' or patients' attitudes. Computer use during consultations lengthened the consultation. Reminder systems for preventive tasks and disease management improved process rates, although some returned to pre-intervention levels when reminders were stopped. Use of computers for issuing prescriptions increased prescribing of generic drugs, and use of computers for test ordering led to cost savings and fewer unnecessary tests. There were no negative effects on those patient outcomes evaluated. Doctors and patients were generally positive about use of computers, but issues of concern included their impact on privacy, the doctor-patient relationship, cost, time, and training needs. Conclusions: Primary care computing systems can improve practitioner performance, particularly for health promotion interventions. This may be at the expense of patient initiated activities, making many practitioners suspicious of the negative impact on relationships with patients. There remains a dearth of evidence evaluating effects on patient outcomes.

    AB - Objectives: To appraise findings from studies examining the impact of computers on primary care consultations. Design: Systematic review of world literature from 1980 to 1997. Data sources: 5475 references were identified from electronic databases (Medline, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Index of Scientific and Technical Proceedings, Embase, OCLC FirstSearch Proceedings), bibliographies, books, identified articles, and by authors active in the field. 1892 eligible abstracts were independently rated, and 89 studies met the inclusion criteria. Main outcome measures: Effect on doctors' performance and patient outcomes; attitudes towards computerisation. Results: 61 studies examined effects of computers on practitioners' performance, 17 evaluated their impact on patient outcome, and 20 studied practitioners' or patients' attitudes. Computer use during consultations lengthened the consultation. Reminder systems for preventive tasks and disease management improved process rates, although some returned to pre-intervention levels when reminders were stopped. Use of computers for issuing prescriptions increased prescribing of generic drugs, and use of computers for test ordering led to cost savings and fewer unnecessary tests. There were no negative effects on those patient outcomes evaluated. Doctors and patients were generally positive about use of computers, but issues of concern included their impact on privacy, the doctor-patient relationship, cost, time, and training needs. Conclusions: Primary care computing systems can improve practitioner performance, particularly for health promotion interventions. This may be at the expense of patient initiated activities, making many practitioners suspicious of the negative impact on relationships with patients. There remains a dearth of evidence evaluating effects on patient outcomes.

    U2 - 10.1136/bmj.322.7281.279

    DO - 10.1136/bmj.322.7281.279

    M3 - Article

    VL - 322

    SP - 279

    EP - 282

    JO - British Medical Journal

    JF - British Medical Journal

    SN - 0959-8146

    IS - 7281

    ER -