A 'Failed Experiment'? Public Ownership and the Narratives of Post-war Britain

Jim Tomlinson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    Public ownership was a key part of Labour politics and British economic Organisation for much of the twentieth century, but may now be regarded as a historical episode, rather than a feature of contemporary life. How is this episode to be evaluated by historians? One route is to incorporate it in the dominant 'decline' narrative, and refer to public ownership as a 'failed experiment'. This paper argues against such an approach, suggesting that the decline narrative is unhelpful and outmoded, and leads to a one-dimensional and overly normative approach. Instead, it is argued that public ownership needs to be analysed as closely rooted in a specific historical context (the 1930s and 1940s) but which came to be deployed in a wholly different one (the 19505 to 1970s). In that latter period its role was not as part of a socialist planned economy, as envisaged by its early advocates, but rather as element of a 'social democratic' economy, in which it played a diverse, unexpected role in underpinning the post-war settlement.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)228-243
    Number of pages16
    JournalLabour History Review
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2008


    • Public ownership
    • Labour history
    • British history


    Dive into the research topics of 'A 'Failed Experiment'? Public Ownership and the Narratives of Post-war Britain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this