Abstract
Public ownership was a key part of Labour politics and British economic Organisation for much of the twentieth century, but may now be regarded as a historical episode, rather than a feature of contemporary life. How is this episode to be evaluated by historians? One route is to incorporate it in the dominant 'decline' narrative, and refer to public ownership as a 'failed experiment'. This paper argues against such an approach, suggesting that the decline narrative is unhelpful and outmoded, and leads to a one-dimensional and overly normative approach. Instead, it is argued that public ownership needs to be analysed as closely rooted in a specific historical context (the 1930s and 1940s) but which came to be deployed in a wholly different one (the 19505 to 1970s). In that latter period its role was not as part of a socialist planned economy, as envisaged by its early advocates, but rather as element of a 'social democratic' economy, in which it played a diverse, unexpected role in underpinning the post-war settlement.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 228-243 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Labour History Review |
| Volume | 73 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2008 |
Keywords
- Public ownership
- Labour history
- British history
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A 'Failed Experiment'? Public Ownership and the Narratives of Post-war Britain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver