A feminist perspective on contract theories from law and economics

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article offers a feminist perspective on contract theories in law,economics and law-and-economics. It identifies masculine traits present contract theories in all three disciplines. It then describes and assesses some developments that appear to be feminising: The recognition of the importance of social norms in contract theory and theories of contract as relationship. The article's main claim is that a masculine model of decision-making persists even within the less overtly masculine models of contract. The problem of sexually transmitted debt resulting from a surety contract is analysed in detail as a specific example supporting the article's general argument. The article concludes that the way forward is to be found in a recognition of other ways of making decisions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)29-46
    Number of pages18
    JournalFeminist Legal Studies
    Volume8
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2000

    Fingerprint

    contract theory
    Law
    economic law
    economics
    decision making
    Social Norms
    indebtedness
    present

    Keywords

    • Contract theory
    • Feminist jurisprudence
    • Economics
    • Law and economics
    • Decision making
    • Sexually transmitted debt

    Cite this

    @article{9a6a8475e7e74ab89515b0dd6d4fc81d,
    title = "A feminist perspective on contract theories from law and economics",
    abstract = "This article offers a feminist perspective on contract theories in law,economics and law-and-economics. It identifies masculine traits present contract theories in all three disciplines. It then describes and assesses some developments that appear to be feminising: The recognition of the importance of social norms in contract theory and theories of contract as relationship. The article's main claim is that a masculine model of decision-making persists even within the less overtly masculine models of contract. The problem of sexually transmitted debt resulting from a surety contract is analysed in detail as a specific example supporting the article's general argument. The article concludes that the way forward is to be found in a recognition of other ways of making decisions.",
    keywords = "Contract theory, Feminist jurisprudence, Economics, Law and economics, Decision making, Sexually transmitted debt",
    author = "Alice Belcher",
    note = "dc.publisher: Kluwer Academic dc.description.sponsorship: Lord Chancellor's Department",
    year = "2000",
    doi = "10.1023/A:1009259224436",
    language = "English",
    volume = "8",
    pages = "29--46",
    journal = "Feminist Legal Studies",
    issn = "0966-3622",
    publisher = "Springer Verlag",
    number = "1",

    }

    A feminist perspective on contract theories from law and economics. / Belcher, Alice.

    In: Feminist Legal Studies, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2000, p. 29-46.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A feminist perspective on contract theories from law and economics

    AU - Belcher, Alice

    N1 - dc.publisher: Kluwer Academic dc.description.sponsorship: Lord Chancellor's Department

    PY - 2000

    Y1 - 2000

    N2 - This article offers a feminist perspective on contract theories in law,economics and law-and-economics. It identifies masculine traits present contract theories in all three disciplines. It then describes and assesses some developments that appear to be feminising: The recognition of the importance of social norms in contract theory and theories of contract as relationship. The article's main claim is that a masculine model of decision-making persists even within the less overtly masculine models of contract. The problem of sexually transmitted debt resulting from a surety contract is analysed in detail as a specific example supporting the article's general argument. The article concludes that the way forward is to be found in a recognition of other ways of making decisions.

    AB - This article offers a feminist perspective on contract theories in law,economics and law-and-economics. It identifies masculine traits present contract theories in all three disciplines. It then describes and assesses some developments that appear to be feminising: The recognition of the importance of social norms in contract theory and theories of contract as relationship. The article's main claim is that a masculine model of decision-making persists even within the less overtly masculine models of contract. The problem of sexually transmitted debt resulting from a surety contract is analysed in detail as a specific example supporting the article's general argument. The article concludes that the way forward is to be found in a recognition of other ways of making decisions.

    KW - Contract theory

    KW - Feminist jurisprudence

    KW - Economics

    KW - Law and economics

    KW - Decision making

    KW - Sexually transmitted debt

    U2 - 10.1023/A:1009259224436

    DO - 10.1023/A:1009259224436

    M3 - Article

    VL - 8

    SP - 29

    EP - 46

    JO - Feminist Legal Studies

    JF - Feminist Legal Studies

    SN - 0966-3622

    IS - 1

    ER -