A global perspective of advanced practice nursing research: A review of systematic reviews

TY - JOUR

T1 - A global perspective of advanced practice nursing research

T2 - A review of systematic reviews

AU - Kilpatrick, Kelley

AU - Savard, Isabelle

AU - Audet, Li Anne

AU - Costanzo, Gina

AU - Khan, Mariam

AU - Atallah, Renée

AU - Jabbour, Mira

AU - Zhou, Wentao

AU - Wheeler, Kathy

AU - Ladd, Elissa

AU - Gray, Deborah C.

AU - Henderson, Colette

AU - Spies, Lori A.

AU - McGrath, Heather

AU - Rogers, Melanie

N1 - Publisher Copyright: Copyright: © 2024 Kilpatrick et al.

PY - 2024/7/2

Y1 - 2024/7/2

N2 - Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) called for the expansion of all nursing roles, including advanced practice nurses (APNs), nurse practitioners (NPs) and clinical nurse specialists (CNSs). A clearer understanding of the impact of these roles will inform global priorities for advanced practice nursing education, research, and policy. Objective To identify gaps in advanced practice nursing research globally. Materials and methods A review of systematic reviews was conducted. We searched CINAHL, Embase, Global Health, Healthstar, PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, DARE, Joanna Briggs Institute EBP, and Web of Science from January 2011 onwards, with no restrictions on jurisdiction or language. Grey literature and hand searches of reference lists were undertaken. Review quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP). Study selection, data extraction and CASP assessments were done independently by two reviewers. We extracted study characteristics, country and outcome data. Data were summarized using narrative synthesis. Results We screened 5840 articles and retained 117 systematic reviews, representing 38 countries. Most CASP criteria were met. However, study selection by two reviewers was done inconsistently and language and geographical restrictions were applied. We found highly consistent evidence that APN, NP and CNS care was equal or superior to the comparator (e.g., physicians) for 29 indicator categories across a wide range of clinical settings, patient populations and acuity levels. Mixed findings were noted for quality of life, consultations, costs, emergency room visits, and health care service delivery where some studies favoured the control groups. No indicator consistently favoured the control group. There is emerging research related to Artificial Intelligence (AI). Conclusion There is a large body of advanced practice nursing research globally, but several WHO regions are underrepresented. Identified research gaps include AI, interprofessional team functioning, workload, and patients and families as partners in healthcare.

AB - Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) called for the expansion of all nursing roles, including advanced practice nurses (APNs), nurse practitioners (NPs) and clinical nurse specialists (CNSs). A clearer understanding of the impact of these roles will inform global priorities for advanced practice nursing education, research, and policy. Objective To identify gaps in advanced practice nursing research globally. Materials and methods A review of systematic reviews was conducted. We searched CINAHL, Embase, Global Health, Healthstar, PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, DARE, Joanna Briggs Institute EBP, and Web of Science from January 2011 onwards, with no restrictions on jurisdiction or language. Grey literature and hand searches of reference lists were undertaken. Review quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP). Study selection, data extraction and CASP assessments were done independently by two reviewers. We extracted study characteristics, country and outcome data. Data were summarized using narrative synthesis. Results We screened 5840 articles and retained 117 systematic reviews, representing 38 countries. Most CASP criteria were met. However, study selection by two reviewers was done inconsistently and language and geographical restrictions were applied. We found highly consistent evidence that APN, NP and CNS care was equal or superior to the comparator (e.g., physicians) for 29 indicator categories across a wide range of clinical settings, patient populations and acuity levels. Mixed findings were noted for quality of life, consultations, costs, emergency room visits, and health care service delivery where some studies favoured the control groups. No indicator consistently favoured the control group. There is emerging research related to Artificial Intelligence (AI). Conclusion There is a large body of advanced practice nursing research globally, but several WHO regions are underrepresented. Identified research gaps include AI, interprofessional team functioning, workload, and patients and families as partners in healthcare.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85197652583

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0305008

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0305008

M3 - Article

C2 - 38954675

AN - SCOPUS:85197652583

SN - 1932-6203

VL - 19

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

IS - 7

M1 - e0305008

ER -