Methods: A hydraulic colonoscope which could be controlled manually or automatically was developed and assessed in a test bed modelled on the anatomy of the human colon. A conventional colonoscope was used by an experienced colonoscopist in the same test bed for comparison. Pressures and forces on the colon were measured during the test.
Results: The hydraulic colonoscope was able to successfully advance through the test bed in a comparable time to the conventional colonoscope. The hydraulic colonoscope reduces measured loads on artificial mesenteries, but increases intraluminal pressure compared to the colonoscope. Both manual and automatically controlled modes were able to successfully advance the hydraulic colonoscope through the colon. However, the automatic controller mode required lower pressures than manual control, but took longer to reach the caecum.
Conclusions: The hydraulic colonoscope appears to be a viable device for further development as forces and pressures observed during use are comparable to those used in current clinical practice.
|Number of pages||11|
|Early online date||22 Jul 2016|
|Publication status||Published - Oct 2016|
|Event||European Association for Endoscopic Surgery - Amsterdam, Netherlands|
Duration: 15 Jun 2016 → 18 Jun 2016
Conference number: 24
- Colorectal cancer
Supervisor: Cuschieri, A. (Supervisor) & Cochran, S. (External person) (Supervisor)
Student thesis: Doctoral Thesis › Doctor of Philosophy