TY - JOUR
T1 - A pilot improvement project in hospital-based oral healthcare
T2 - improving caries risk assessment documentation
AU - Keightley, A. J.
AU - Lucey, S. M.
AU - Leitch, J.
AU - Lloyd, R. C.
AU - Campbell, C.
PY - 2012/1
Y1 - 2012/1
N2 - Objective To evaluate the impact of a continuous improvement project to improve completion of a caries risk assessment (CRA) and to assess its impact on delivery of dental caries prevention. Design Single centre clinical improvement project. Setting A paediatric dental department within a UK dental hospital over the course of 2008-2009. Subjects (materials) and methods Continuous monitoring of documentation of a CRA was instigated and results fed back to clinicians. Tools were developed to structure the process of CRA. After six months of intervention, a comparison of preventive care to a pre-intervention sample was undertaken. Main outcome measures The main outcome measure was completion of a CRA. Comparison was also made with pre-intervention data on levels of preventive care received. Results Over the 12 month project the mean rate of CRA completion improved from 30% over the first 6 months to 73% in the second 6 months. Compared to the pre-intervention sample, all items of the caries prevention package had improved, with delivery of toothpaste strength advice (16% vs 60%, p = 0.001) and diet advice (32% vs 70%, p = 0.004) improving significantly. Conclusion By targeting and improving CRA completion the quality of preventive care delivered has also significantly improved.
AB - Objective To evaluate the impact of a continuous improvement project to improve completion of a caries risk assessment (CRA) and to assess its impact on delivery of dental caries prevention. Design Single centre clinical improvement project. Setting A paediatric dental department within a UK dental hospital over the course of 2008-2009. Subjects (materials) and methods Continuous monitoring of documentation of a CRA was instigated and results fed back to clinicians. Tools were developed to structure the process of CRA. After six months of intervention, a comparison of preventive care to a pre-intervention sample was undertaken. Main outcome measures The main outcome measure was completion of a CRA. Comparison was also made with pre-intervention data on levels of preventive care received. Results Over the 12 month project the mean rate of CRA completion improved from 30% over the first 6 months to 73% in the second 6 months. Compared to the pre-intervention sample, all items of the caries prevention package had improved, with delivery of toothpaste strength advice (16% vs 60%, p = 0.001) and diet advice (32% vs 70%, p = 0.004) improving significantly. Conclusion By targeting and improving CRA completion the quality of preventive care delivered has also significantly improved.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856437017&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.49
DO - 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.49
M3 - Article
C2 - 22281654
SN - 0007-0610
VL - 212
SP - E3
JO - British Dental Journal
JF - British Dental Journal
IS - 2
ER -