A psychoanalytic probe into Academic Othering of the United States: Defenses of splitting and projection, consequences, and alternatives through emotion work

Eda Ulus (Lead / Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

For this Special Paper Series of Organization, I work with a psychoanalytic perspective to scrutinize organizing processes as critical academics—specifically, unconscious dynamics of responding to US-based social crises. I contend that it is not feasible to organize effectively against the violent hate of right-wing populist movements sustained by Othering without commitment to confronting academics’ individual and collective Othering and defensive processes. These defenses include splitting and projecting onto convenient Others, which can serve performative gratifications. Through analysis of critical academic declarations in 2017, I analyze Academic Othering of the United States. Splitting the United States off as the ‘bad’ Other of the ‘good’ United Kingdom/European Union/non-United States undermines critical analysis and potential for solidarity and relational concern. Without probing these uncomfortable dynamics, we damage opportunities as elite, privileged academics to make a difference for global struggles, and collude in exclusion. Undertaking emotion work on our academic identities to move away from the defense of splitting, and toward nuance with Klein’s depressive position, will support listening to affected voices and extending—not merely performing—concern and care.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages10
JournalOrganization
Early online date9 Oct 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 9 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Othering
Emotion work
European Union
Exclusion
Solidarity
Organizing
Elites
Damage

Keywords

  • Academia
  • activism
  • anxiety
  • borders
  • critical management
  • defense mechanisms
  • Othering
  • projection
  • solidarity
  • splitting
  • unconscious
  • US

Cite this

@article{ef1e7d2974a24bbab2a9d059ace3cf98,
title = "A psychoanalytic probe into Academic Othering of the United States: Defenses of splitting and projection, consequences, and alternatives through emotion work",
abstract = "For this Special Paper Series of Organization, I work with a psychoanalytic perspective to scrutinize organizing processes as critical academics—specifically, unconscious dynamics of responding to US-based social crises. I contend that it is not feasible to organize effectively against the violent hate of right-wing populist movements sustained by Othering without commitment to confronting academics’ individual and collective Othering and defensive processes. These defenses include splitting and projecting onto convenient Others, which can serve performative gratifications. Through analysis of critical academic declarations in 2017, I analyze Academic Othering of the United States. Splitting the United States off as the ‘bad’ Other of the ‘good’ United Kingdom/European Union/non-United States undermines critical analysis and potential for solidarity and relational concern. Without probing these uncomfortable dynamics, we damage opportunities as elite, privileged academics to make a difference for global struggles, and collude in exclusion. Undertaking emotion work on our academic identities to move away from the defense of splitting, and toward nuance with Klein’s depressive position, will support listening to affected voices and extending—not merely performing—concern and care.",
keywords = "Academia, activism, anxiety, borders, critical management, defense mechanisms, Othering, projection, solidarity, splitting, unconscious, US",
author = "Eda Ulus",
note = "No Funding.",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1177/1350508419876480",
language = "English",
journal = "Organization",
issn = "1350-5084",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A psychoanalytic probe into Academic Othering of the United States

T2 - Defenses of splitting and projection, consequences, and alternatives through emotion work

AU - Ulus, Eda

N1 - No Funding.

PY - 2019/10/9

Y1 - 2019/10/9

N2 - For this Special Paper Series of Organization, I work with a psychoanalytic perspective to scrutinize organizing processes as critical academics—specifically, unconscious dynamics of responding to US-based social crises. I contend that it is not feasible to organize effectively against the violent hate of right-wing populist movements sustained by Othering without commitment to confronting academics’ individual and collective Othering and defensive processes. These defenses include splitting and projecting onto convenient Others, which can serve performative gratifications. Through analysis of critical academic declarations in 2017, I analyze Academic Othering of the United States. Splitting the United States off as the ‘bad’ Other of the ‘good’ United Kingdom/European Union/non-United States undermines critical analysis and potential for solidarity and relational concern. Without probing these uncomfortable dynamics, we damage opportunities as elite, privileged academics to make a difference for global struggles, and collude in exclusion. Undertaking emotion work on our academic identities to move away from the defense of splitting, and toward nuance with Klein’s depressive position, will support listening to affected voices and extending—not merely performing—concern and care.

AB - For this Special Paper Series of Organization, I work with a psychoanalytic perspective to scrutinize organizing processes as critical academics—specifically, unconscious dynamics of responding to US-based social crises. I contend that it is not feasible to organize effectively against the violent hate of right-wing populist movements sustained by Othering without commitment to confronting academics’ individual and collective Othering and defensive processes. These defenses include splitting and projecting onto convenient Others, which can serve performative gratifications. Through analysis of critical academic declarations in 2017, I analyze Academic Othering of the United States. Splitting the United States off as the ‘bad’ Other of the ‘good’ United Kingdom/European Union/non-United States undermines critical analysis and potential for solidarity and relational concern. Without probing these uncomfortable dynamics, we damage opportunities as elite, privileged academics to make a difference for global struggles, and collude in exclusion. Undertaking emotion work on our academic identities to move away from the defense of splitting, and toward nuance with Klein’s depressive position, will support listening to affected voices and extending—not merely performing—concern and care.

KW - Academia

KW - activism

KW - anxiety

KW - borders

KW - critical management

KW - defense mechanisms

KW - Othering

KW - projection

KW - solidarity

KW - splitting

KW - unconscious

KW - US

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074030077&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1350508419876480

DO - 10.1177/1350508419876480

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074030077

JO - Organization

JF - Organization

SN - 1350-5084

ER -