A strategic action fields perspective on organizational trust repair

Branko Bozic (Lead / Corresponding author), Sabina Siebert, Graeme Martin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    103 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    While the extant literature on organizational trust repair has considered the agency and trust repair actions of individual organizations, it has neglected repair following trust-damaging events affecting specific industries. Drawing on the theory of strategic action fields we ask two research questions: (1) How do reputational scandals involving a few transgressing firms affect trust in the whole institutional field? (2) Do the transgressing firms repair trust in the same way as the blameless ones in the same field? To answer these questions we investigated four cases of retail organizations that engaged in trust repair actions following a food safety scandal, two that were widely held to have transgressed, and two that were held to be relatively blameless. We compared the trust repair strategies of both groups, finding that even the blameless organizations felt compelled to act to repair trust. However, blameless organizations also sought to differentiate themselves from the transgressing ones by using specific strategies to restore trust.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalEuropean Management Journal
    Early online date3 May 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 May 2018

    Fingerprint

    Organizational trust
    Trust repair
    Strategic action
    Scandal
    Industry
    Repair
    Retail
    Food safety

    Keywords

    • Organizational trust
    • Strategic action fields
    • Trust breach
    • Trust repair

    Cite this

    @article{7da98223ce254726b1f95b433c8444e3,
    title = "A strategic action fields perspective on organizational trust repair",
    abstract = "While the extant literature on organizational trust repair has considered the agency and trust repair actions of individual organizations, it has neglected repair following trust-damaging events affecting specific industries. Drawing on the theory of strategic action fields we ask two research questions: (1) How do reputational scandals involving a few transgressing firms affect trust in the whole institutional field? (2) Do the transgressing firms repair trust in the same way as the blameless ones in the same field? To answer these questions we investigated four cases of retail organizations that engaged in trust repair actions following a food safety scandal, two that were widely held to have transgressed, and two that were held to be relatively blameless. We compared the trust repair strategies of both groups, finding that even the blameless organizations felt compelled to act to repair trust. However, blameless organizations also sought to differentiate themselves from the transgressing ones by using specific strategies to restore trust.",
    keywords = "Organizational trust, Strategic action fields, Trust breach, Trust repair",
    author = "Branko Bozic and Sabina Siebert and Graeme Martin",
    note = "no funding unfo",
    year = "2018",
    month = "5",
    day = "3",
    doi = "10.1016/j.emj.2018.04.005",
    language = "English",
    journal = "European Management Journal",
    issn = "0263-2373",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    A strategic action fields perspective on organizational trust repair. / Bozic, Branko (Lead / Corresponding author); Siebert, Sabina; Martin, Graeme.

    In: European Management Journal, 03.05.2018.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A strategic action fields perspective on organizational trust repair

    AU - Bozic, Branko

    AU - Siebert, Sabina

    AU - Martin, Graeme

    N1 - no funding unfo

    PY - 2018/5/3

    Y1 - 2018/5/3

    N2 - While the extant literature on organizational trust repair has considered the agency and trust repair actions of individual organizations, it has neglected repair following trust-damaging events affecting specific industries. Drawing on the theory of strategic action fields we ask two research questions: (1) How do reputational scandals involving a few transgressing firms affect trust in the whole institutional field? (2) Do the transgressing firms repair trust in the same way as the blameless ones in the same field? To answer these questions we investigated four cases of retail organizations that engaged in trust repair actions following a food safety scandal, two that were widely held to have transgressed, and two that were held to be relatively blameless. We compared the trust repair strategies of both groups, finding that even the blameless organizations felt compelled to act to repair trust. However, blameless organizations also sought to differentiate themselves from the transgressing ones by using specific strategies to restore trust.

    AB - While the extant literature on organizational trust repair has considered the agency and trust repair actions of individual organizations, it has neglected repair following trust-damaging events affecting specific industries. Drawing on the theory of strategic action fields we ask two research questions: (1) How do reputational scandals involving a few transgressing firms affect trust in the whole institutional field? (2) Do the transgressing firms repair trust in the same way as the blameless ones in the same field? To answer these questions we investigated four cases of retail organizations that engaged in trust repair actions following a food safety scandal, two that were widely held to have transgressed, and two that were held to be relatively blameless. We compared the trust repair strategies of both groups, finding that even the blameless organizations felt compelled to act to repair trust. However, blameless organizations also sought to differentiate themselves from the transgressing ones by using specific strategies to restore trust.

    KW - Organizational trust

    KW - Strategic action fields

    KW - Trust breach

    KW - Trust repair

    U2 - 10.1016/j.emj.2018.04.005

    DO - 10.1016/j.emj.2018.04.005

    M3 - Article

    JO - European Management Journal

    JF - European Management Journal

    SN - 0263-2373

    ER -