A study of the safety of current gastrointestinal endoscopy (EGD)

TY - JOUR

T1 - A study of the safety of current gastrointestinal endoscopy (EGD)

AU - McLernon, D. J.

AU - Donnan, P. T.

AU - Crozier, A.

AU - Dillon, J.

AU - Mowat, C.

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - Background and study aims: Previous attempts at assessing the safety of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy have been hampered by incomplete data collection. We aimed to assess the 30-day mortality associated with esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and assess the important risk factors.Patients and methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients who underwent endoscopy at Ninewells Hospital in Dundee between 1 June 2000 and 31 May 2003. A total of 11501 EGDs were performed in 8926 patients. These patients were record-linked to the death registry and the database of hospital admissions in order to calculate the all-cause 30-day mortality. An expert panel judged whether EGD had caused or contributed to the deaths. Logistic regression analysis was performed on outcomes of all-cause and EGD-contributed mortality.Results: The median age of the patients was 62 years (interquartile range 48-74 years), 54% were women, and 94% of procedures were diagnostic. A total of 395 patients died within 30 days (all-cause 30-day mortality rate 4.4%). One patient death was caused directly by the EGD (procedure-caused mortality rate 1 in 9000). EGD was judged to have contributed to patient deaths at a rate of 1 in 182, based on majority agreement of experts: some factors associated with these deaths were percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion (odds ratio [OR] 18.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.71 - 59.22), melena or hematemesis indications (OR 9.01, 95% Cl 3.53-22.99), and esophageal varices (OR 6.28, 95% CI 1.54 - 25.60).Conclusions: A causal death rate of 1 in 9000 suggests that EGD is very safe. However, certain patient groups have an increased mortality, and the risks and benefits of EGD should be carefully evaluated in each patient.

AB - Background and study aims: Previous attempts at assessing the safety of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy have been hampered by incomplete data collection. We aimed to assess the 30-day mortality associated with esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and assess the important risk factors.Patients and methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients who underwent endoscopy at Ninewells Hospital in Dundee between 1 June 2000 and 31 May 2003. A total of 11501 EGDs were performed in 8926 patients. These patients were record-linked to the death registry and the database of hospital admissions in order to calculate the all-cause 30-day mortality. An expert panel judged whether EGD had caused or contributed to the deaths. Logistic regression analysis was performed on outcomes of all-cause and EGD-contributed mortality.Results: The median age of the patients was 62 years (interquartile range 48-74 years), 54% were women, and 94% of procedures were diagnostic. A total of 395 patients died within 30 days (all-cause 30-day mortality rate 4.4%). One patient death was caused directly by the EGD (procedure-caused mortality rate 1 in 9000). EGD was judged to have contributed to patient deaths at a rate of 1 in 182, based on majority agreement of experts: some factors associated with these deaths were percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion (odds ratio [OR] 18.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.71 - 59.22), melena or hematemesis indications (OR 9.01, 95% Cl 3.53-22.99), and esophageal varices (OR 6.28, 95% CI 1.54 - 25.60).Conclusions: A causal death rate of 1 in 9000 suggests that EGD is very safe. However, certain patient groups have an increased mortality, and the risks and benefits of EGD should be carefully evaluated in each patient.

U2 - 10.1055/s-2007-966578

DO - 10.1055/s-2007-966578

M3 - Article

C2 - 17661243

SN - 0013-726X

VL - 39

SP - 692

EP - 700

JO - Endoscopy

JF - Endoscopy

IS - 8

ER -