A study of the variability in footwear impression comparison conclusions

L. Hammer (Lead / Corresponding author), K. Duffy, J. Fraser, N. Nic Daeid (Lead / Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)


The 2009 National Academy of Science report, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward, cited a 1996 European study of footwear examiner conclusions and used it to illustrate that there were "considerable differences" found between conclusions of footwear examiners. The basic methodology of that study was repeated in 2009 in North America. Six footwear case studies were created and sent to participating certified footwear examiners. The examiners were asked to independently assess each case based on features that were clearly marked on each impression, and they were directed to use a specific scale of conclusions to report their findings. The results of this study, in contrast to the 1996 study, were that when experienced examiners used the same conclusion scale and compared the same features, there was little variability within their stated findings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)205-218
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Forensic Identification
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2013


Dive into the research topics of 'A study of the variability in footwear impression comparison conclusions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this