A working typology of response options to manage environmental change and their scope for complementarity using an Ecosystem Approach

Iain Brown, Mark Everard

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    9 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    A diverse range of response options is available for decision-makers to manage environmental change and meet sustainability objectives. These can include inter alia: top-down statutory regulation and levies; bottom-up initiatives including quality assurance networks or community-based partnerships; formal incentives; and voluntary market-based schemes such as 'payments for ecosystem services' or offsetting. Each type of response option has a distinct set of characteristics, which suggests that they may be best suited to different contexts rather than presumed to be effective in all circumstances. These attributes are used to develop a working typology to help understand the strengths and weaknesses of different response types, particularly regarding adaptation to long-term change and handling of uncertainty. To facilitate this, response types are referenced from a socio-ecological systems perspective using a refined version of the DPSIR integrated assessment framework to incorporate ecosystem functions and services. This shows that some responses are more clearly associated with maintaining resilience of natural functions, whilst others are directed at human-defined services. The role of stakeholders in response options can also be distinguished such as comparing mandatory or voluntary initiatives. Polluter-pays approaches are therefore distinguished from beneficiary-pays approaches. The typology can therefore provide a working reference framework for recognising complementary rather than conflicting interventions, as guided by the holistic principles of the Ecosystem Approach.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)61-73
    Number of pages13
    JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
    Volume52
    Early online date23 May 2015
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2015

    Fingerprint

    ecosystem approach
    complementarity
    typology
    ecosystem service
    environmental change
    ecosystem function
    long-term change
    incentive
    stakeholder
    ecological system
    sustainability
    quality assurance
    resilience
    market
    decision maker
    uncertainty
    regulation
    community
    levy
    attribute

    Keywords

    • Ecosystem services
    • Environmental change
    • Integrated assessment
    • Policy appraisal
    • Response options
    • Robust decision-making
    • Typology

    Cite this

    @article{ac316abee9134c52bbc51a661e938fb8,
    title = "A working typology of response options to manage environmental change and their scope for complementarity using an Ecosystem Approach",
    abstract = "A diverse range of response options is available for decision-makers to manage environmental change and meet sustainability objectives. These can include inter alia: top-down statutory regulation and levies; bottom-up initiatives including quality assurance networks or community-based partnerships; formal incentives; and voluntary market-based schemes such as 'payments for ecosystem services' or offsetting. Each type of response option has a distinct set of characteristics, which suggests that they may be best suited to different contexts rather than presumed to be effective in all circumstances. These attributes are used to develop a working typology to help understand the strengths and weaknesses of different response types, particularly regarding adaptation to long-term change and handling of uncertainty. To facilitate this, response types are referenced from a socio-ecological systems perspective using a refined version of the DPSIR integrated assessment framework to incorporate ecosystem functions and services. This shows that some responses are more clearly associated with maintaining resilience of natural functions, whilst others are directed at human-defined services. The role of stakeholders in response options can also be distinguished such as comparing mandatory or voluntary initiatives. Polluter-pays approaches are therefore distinguished from beneficiary-pays approaches. The typology can therefore provide a working reference framework for recognising complementary rather than conflicting interventions, as guided by the holistic principles of the Ecosystem Approach.",
    keywords = "Ecosystem services, Environmental change, Integrated assessment, Policy appraisal, Response options, Robust decision-making, Typology",
    author = "Iain Brown and Mark Everard",
    year = "2015",
    month = "10",
    doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.006",
    language = "English",
    volume = "52",
    pages = "61--73",
    journal = "Environmental Science and Policy",
    issn = "1462-9011",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A working typology of response options to manage environmental change and their scope for complementarity using an Ecosystem Approach

    AU - Brown, Iain

    AU - Everard, Mark

    PY - 2015/10

    Y1 - 2015/10

    N2 - A diverse range of response options is available for decision-makers to manage environmental change and meet sustainability objectives. These can include inter alia: top-down statutory regulation and levies; bottom-up initiatives including quality assurance networks or community-based partnerships; formal incentives; and voluntary market-based schemes such as 'payments for ecosystem services' or offsetting. Each type of response option has a distinct set of characteristics, which suggests that they may be best suited to different contexts rather than presumed to be effective in all circumstances. These attributes are used to develop a working typology to help understand the strengths and weaknesses of different response types, particularly regarding adaptation to long-term change and handling of uncertainty. To facilitate this, response types are referenced from a socio-ecological systems perspective using a refined version of the DPSIR integrated assessment framework to incorporate ecosystem functions and services. This shows that some responses are more clearly associated with maintaining resilience of natural functions, whilst others are directed at human-defined services. The role of stakeholders in response options can also be distinguished such as comparing mandatory or voluntary initiatives. Polluter-pays approaches are therefore distinguished from beneficiary-pays approaches. The typology can therefore provide a working reference framework for recognising complementary rather than conflicting interventions, as guided by the holistic principles of the Ecosystem Approach.

    AB - A diverse range of response options is available for decision-makers to manage environmental change and meet sustainability objectives. These can include inter alia: top-down statutory regulation and levies; bottom-up initiatives including quality assurance networks or community-based partnerships; formal incentives; and voluntary market-based schemes such as 'payments for ecosystem services' or offsetting. Each type of response option has a distinct set of characteristics, which suggests that they may be best suited to different contexts rather than presumed to be effective in all circumstances. These attributes are used to develop a working typology to help understand the strengths and weaknesses of different response types, particularly regarding adaptation to long-term change and handling of uncertainty. To facilitate this, response types are referenced from a socio-ecological systems perspective using a refined version of the DPSIR integrated assessment framework to incorporate ecosystem functions and services. This shows that some responses are more clearly associated with maintaining resilience of natural functions, whilst others are directed at human-defined services. The role of stakeholders in response options can also be distinguished such as comparing mandatory or voluntary initiatives. Polluter-pays approaches are therefore distinguished from beneficiary-pays approaches. The typology can therefore provide a working reference framework for recognising complementary rather than conflicting interventions, as guided by the holistic principles of the Ecosystem Approach.

    KW - Ecosystem services

    KW - Environmental change

    KW - Integrated assessment

    KW - Policy appraisal

    KW - Response options

    KW - Robust decision-making

    KW - Typology

    U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.006

    DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.006

    M3 - Article

    VL - 52

    SP - 61

    EP - 73

    JO - Environmental Science and Policy

    JF - Environmental Science and Policy

    SN - 1462-9011

    ER -