Abdominal Wall Lift Systems in Laparoscopic Surgery

Gasless and Low-pressure Systems

Afshin Alijani, Alfred Cuschieri (Lead / Corresponding author)

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    20 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Positive pressure pneumoperitoneum (12 mm Hg) is associated with adverse physiologic effects that can prove detrimental to certain high-risk patients with diminished cardiorespiratory reserve. Mechanical abdominal wall lift (AWL) has been proposed as an alternative method of exposure in laparoscopic surgery to obviate or minimize these adverse physiologic effects, the risk of CO2 embolism in trauma patients, and tumor dissemination in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for cancer. This article reviews the systems available for AWL, the clinical applications of the technique, and the findings of the randomized controlled trials that compare AWL with conventional pneumoperitoneum. AWL systems do appear to reduce the adverse cardiovascular and respiratory effects, but they do so at the expense of surgical exposure, which is less optimal than that provided by the positive-pressure pneumoperitoneum. This reduced exposure increases the execution difficulty of the operation and, hence, the operating times. This problem is overcome by combination of AWL with low-pressure (3 to 4 mm Hg) pneumoperitoneum. This combination provides good surgical exposure without adverse cardiovascular consequences. Copyright © 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)53-62
    Number of pages10
    JournalSurgical Innovation
    Volume8
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2001

    Fingerprint

    Abdominal Wall
    Pneumoperitoneum
    Laparoscopy
    Pressure
    Embolism
    Neoplasms
    Randomized Controlled Trials
    Wounds and Injuries

    Cite this

    @article{c1bcc9100b9340cda22ab6bf16dccd17,
    title = "Abdominal Wall Lift Systems in Laparoscopic Surgery: Gasless and Low-pressure Systems",
    abstract = "Positive pressure pneumoperitoneum (12 mm Hg) is associated with adverse physiologic effects that can prove detrimental to certain high-risk patients with diminished cardiorespiratory reserve. Mechanical abdominal wall lift (AWL) has been proposed as an alternative method of exposure in laparoscopic surgery to obviate or minimize these adverse physiologic effects, the risk of CO2 embolism in trauma patients, and tumor dissemination in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for cancer. This article reviews the systems available for AWL, the clinical applications of the technique, and the findings of the randomized controlled trials that compare AWL with conventional pneumoperitoneum. AWL systems do appear to reduce the adverse cardiovascular and respiratory effects, but they do so at the expense of surgical exposure, which is less optimal than that provided by the positive-pressure pneumoperitoneum. This reduced exposure increases the execution difficulty of the operation and, hence, the operating times. This problem is overcome by combination of AWL with low-pressure (3 to 4 mm Hg) pneumoperitoneum. This combination provides good surgical exposure without adverse cardiovascular consequences. Copyright {\circledC} 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.",
    author = "Afshin Alijani and Alfred Cuschieri",
    year = "2001",
    month = "3",
    doi = "10.1177/155335060100800106",
    language = "English",
    volume = "8",
    pages = "53--62",
    journal = "Surgical Innovation",
    issn = "1553-3506",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications",
    number = "1",

    }

    Abdominal Wall Lift Systems in Laparoscopic Surgery : Gasless and Low-pressure Systems. / Alijani, Afshin; Cuschieri, Alfred (Lead / Corresponding author).

    In: Surgical Innovation, Vol. 8, No. 1, 03.2001, p. 53-62.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Abdominal Wall Lift Systems in Laparoscopic Surgery

    T2 - Gasless and Low-pressure Systems

    AU - Alijani, Afshin

    AU - Cuschieri, Alfred

    PY - 2001/3

    Y1 - 2001/3

    N2 - Positive pressure pneumoperitoneum (12 mm Hg) is associated with adverse physiologic effects that can prove detrimental to certain high-risk patients with diminished cardiorespiratory reserve. Mechanical abdominal wall lift (AWL) has been proposed as an alternative method of exposure in laparoscopic surgery to obviate or minimize these adverse physiologic effects, the risk of CO2 embolism in trauma patients, and tumor dissemination in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for cancer. This article reviews the systems available for AWL, the clinical applications of the technique, and the findings of the randomized controlled trials that compare AWL with conventional pneumoperitoneum. AWL systems do appear to reduce the adverse cardiovascular and respiratory effects, but they do so at the expense of surgical exposure, which is less optimal than that provided by the positive-pressure pneumoperitoneum. This reduced exposure increases the execution difficulty of the operation and, hence, the operating times. This problem is overcome by combination of AWL with low-pressure (3 to 4 mm Hg) pneumoperitoneum. This combination provides good surgical exposure without adverse cardiovascular consequences. Copyright © 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.

    AB - Positive pressure pneumoperitoneum (12 mm Hg) is associated with adverse physiologic effects that can prove detrimental to certain high-risk patients with diminished cardiorespiratory reserve. Mechanical abdominal wall lift (AWL) has been proposed as an alternative method of exposure in laparoscopic surgery to obviate or minimize these adverse physiologic effects, the risk of CO2 embolism in trauma patients, and tumor dissemination in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for cancer. This article reviews the systems available for AWL, the clinical applications of the technique, and the findings of the randomized controlled trials that compare AWL with conventional pneumoperitoneum. AWL systems do appear to reduce the adverse cardiovascular and respiratory effects, but they do so at the expense of surgical exposure, which is less optimal than that provided by the positive-pressure pneumoperitoneum. This reduced exposure increases the execution difficulty of the operation and, hence, the operating times. This problem is overcome by combination of AWL with low-pressure (3 to 4 mm Hg) pneumoperitoneum. This combination provides good surgical exposure without adverse cardiovascular consequences. Copyright © 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.

    U2 - 10.1177/155335060100800106

    DO - 10.1177/155335060100800106

    M3 - Article

    VL - 8

    SP - 53

    EP - 62

    JO - Surgical Innovation

    JF - Surgical Innovation

    SN - 1553-3506

    IS - 1

    ER -