TY - JOUR
T1 - Ability of primary care health databases to assess medicinal products discussed by the European Union Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee
AU - Flynn, Robert
AU - Hedenmalm, Karin
AU - Murray-Thomas, Tarita
AU - Pacurariu, Alexandra
AU - Arlett, Peter
AU - Shepherd, Hilary
AU - Myles, Puja
AU - Kurz, Xavier
N1 - © 2020 The Authors Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2020 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
PY - 2020/2/12
Y1 - 2020/2/12
N2 - This study measured the exposure to different categories of medicinal products discussed by the EU Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee from September to November 2018 in 4 electronic primary care health databases: IQVIA Medical Research Data-UK, IQVIA Medical Research Data-France, IQVIA Medical Research Data-Germany, and Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum, in the entire lifespan of each database until 31 August 2018. The assessment of 83 centrally authorized products and 45 nationally authorized products showed that coverage was better for products marketed for longer duration and worse for orphan drugs. The ability to detect associations against hypothetical comparators was better for more common events and for larger effect sizes. Coverage of advanced therapies was worse for those typically administered in a specialised rather than primary care setting. This study shows that to enable better informed regulatory decisions there is a need to access complementary data sources, particularly capturing secondary care prescribing.
AB - This study measured the exposure to different categories of medicinal products discussed by the EU Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee from September to November 2018 in 4 electronic primary care health databases: IQVIA Medical Research Data-UK, IQVIA Medical Research Data-France, IQVIA Medical Research Data-Germany, and Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum, in the entire lifespan of each database until 31 August 2018. The assessment of 83 centrally authorized products and 45 nationally authorized products showed that coverage was better for products marketed for longer duration and worse for orphan drugs. The ability to detect associations against hypothetical comparators was better for more common events and for larger effect sizes. Coverage of advanced therapies was worse for those typically administered in a specialised rather than primary care setting. This study shows that to enable better informed regulatory decisions there is a need to access complementary data sources, particularly capturing secondary care prescribing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079416041&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cpt.1775
DO - 10.1002/cpt.1775
M3 - Article
C2 - 31955404
SN - 0009-9236
VL - 107
SP - 957
EP - 965
JO - Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
JF - Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
IS - 4
ER -