TY - JOUR
T1 - An experimental COVID-19 messaging study in a representative sample of the Scottish population
T2 - Increasing physical distancing intentions through self-efficacy
AU - den Daas, Chantal
AU - Johnston, Marie
AU - Hubbard, Gill
AU - Dixon, Diane
AU - Cristea, Mioara
AU - Davis, Alive
AU - Dobbie, Fiona
AU - Fitzgerald, Niamh
AU - Fleming, Leanne
AU - Fraquharson, Barbara
AU - Gorely, Trish
AU - Gray, Cindy
AU - Grindle, Mark
AU - HarkessMurphy, Eileen
AU - Hunt, Kate
AU - Ion, Robin
AU - Kidd, Lisa
AU - Lansdown, Terry
AU - Macaden, Leah
AU - Maltinsky, Wendy
AU - Mercer, Stewart
AU - Murchie, Peter
AU - O'Carroll, Ronan
AU - O'Donnell, Kate
AU - Ozakinci, Gozde
AU - Pitkethly, Amanda
AU - Reid, Kate
AU - Sidhva, Dina
AU - Stead, Martine
AU - Stewart, Mary E.
AU - Tolson, Debbie
AU - Thompson, Catharine Ward
AU - Wyke, Sally
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Objectives: Self-efficacy is important for adherence to transmission-reducing behaviours (e.g., physical distancing) as also shown in the CHARIS project. We aimed to show that a theory-based short message can increase physical distancing self-efficacy and intentions to keep physical distance. Design: Structured telephone surveys with a randomly selected nationally representative sample of adults in Scotland (N = 497). Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to one of two experimental conditions: message condition (short message to increase self-efficacy via vicarious experiences, verbal persuasion and emotional arousal) or control condition (no message). Followed by measures for self-efficacy and intention for physical distancing on 4-point scales. Adherence to physical distancing was assessed on a 5-point frequency scale (never – always). Results: Using mediation analyses with bootstrapping procedures, we first confirmed that self-efficacy was associated indirectly with adherence, via higher intentions in a partial mediation (unstandardized indirect effect.21, 95% CI.18–.25). The message increased self-efficacy; participants receiving the message reported higher self-efficacy (M = 4.23, SD =.80) compared to participants in the control condition (M = 4.08, SD =.77; standardized regression coefficient =.19, p <.05) and self-efficacy affected intention (.48, p <.001). There was a small significant indirect effect of the message on intention via self-efficacy (unstandardized indirect effect.07, CI.01–.14). Conclusions: Increasing self-efficacy for physical distancing with a short message can successfully increase intention to physical distance via increased self-efficacy. As both self-efficacy and intentions are important predictors of adherence to transmission-reducing behaviours short messages have potential to limit the spread of COVID-19.
AB - Objectives: Self-efficacy is important for adherence to transmission-reducing behaviours (e.g., physical distancing) as also shown in the CHARIS project. We aimed to show that a theory-based short message can increase physical distancing self-efficacy and intentions to keep physical distance. Design: Structured telephone surveys with a randomly selected nationally representative sample of adults in Scotland (N = 497). Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to one of two experimental conditions: message condition (short message to increase self-efficacy via vicarious experiences, verbal persuasion and emotional arousal) or control condition (no message). Followed by measures for self-efficacy and intention for physical distancing on 4-point scales. Adherence to physical distancing was assessed on a 5-point frequency scale (never – always). Results: Using mediation analyses with bootstrapping procedures, we first confirmed that self-efficacy was associated indirectly with adherence, via higher intentions in a partial mediation (unstandardized indirect effect.21, 95% CI.18–.25). The message increased self-efficacy; participants receiving the message reported higher self-efficacy (M = 4.23, SD =.80) compared to participants in the control condition (M = 4.08, SD =.77; standardized regression coefficient =.19, p <.05) and self-efficacy affected intention (.48, p <.001). There was a small significant indirect effect of the message on intention via self-efficacy (unstandardized indirect effect.07, CI.01–.14). Conclusions: Increasing self-efficacy for physical distancing with a short message can successfully increase intention to physical distance via increased self-efficacy. As both self-efficacy and intentions are important predictors of adherence to transmission-reducing behaviours short messages have potential to limit the spread of COVID-19.
KW - adherence
KW - COVID-19
KW - intentions
KW - messaging
KW - physical distancing
KW - self-efficacy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141222951&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/bjhp.12632
DO - 10.1111/bjhp.12632
M3 - Article
C2 - 36317412
AN - SCOPUS:85141222951
SN - 1359-107X
VL - 28
SP - 439
EP - 450
JO - British Journal of Health Psychology
JF - British Journal of Health Psychology
IS - 2
ER -