An integrative framework of conflict and control

Daniela Becker, Erik Bijleveld, Senne Braem, Kerstin Fröber, Felix J. Götz, Tali Kleiman, Anita Körner, Roland Pfister, Andrea M.F. Reiter, Blair Saunders, Iris K. Schneider, Alexander Soutschek, Henk van Steenbergen, David Dignath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

People regularly encounter various types of conflict. Here, we ask if, and, if so, how, different types of conflict, from lab-based Stroop conflicts to everyday-life self-control or moral conflicts, are related to one other. We present a framework that assumes that action–goal representations are hierarchically organized, ranging from concrete actions to abstract goals. The framework’s key assumption is that conflicts involving more abstract goals (e.g., self-control/moral conflict) are embedded in a more complex action space; thus, to resolve such conflicts, people need to consider more associated goals and actions. We discuss how differences in complexity impact conflict resolution mechanisms and the costs/benefits of resolving conflicts. Altogether, we offer a new way to conceptualize and analyze conflict regulation across different domains.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)757-768
Number of pages12
JournalTrends in Cognitive Sciences
Volume28
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Aug 2024

Keywords

  • Cognitive control
  • Conflict
  • Conflict resolution
  • Self-control
  • Moral decision making
  • Complexity
  • complexity
  • conflict resolution
  • cognitive control
  • self-control
  • moral decision making
  • conflict

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An integrative framework of conflict and control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this