Abstract
People regularly encounter various types of conflict. Here, we ask if, and, if so, how, different types of conflict, from lab-based Stroop conflicts to everyday-life self-control or moral conflicts, are related to one other. We present a framework that assumes that action–goal representations are hierarchically organized, ranging from concrete actions to abstract goals. The framework’s key assumption is that conflicts involving more abstract goals (e.g., self-control/moral conflict) are embedded in a more complex action space; thus, to resolve such conflicts, people need to consider more associated goals and actions. We discuss how differences in complexity impact conflict resolution mechanisms and the costs/benefits of resolving conflicts. Altogether, we offer a new way to conceptualize and analyze conflict regulation across different domains.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 757-768 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Trends in Cognitive Sciences |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 6 Aug 2024 |
Keywords
- Cognitive control
- Conflict
- Conflict resolution
- Self-control
- Moral decision making
- Complexity
- complexity
- conflict resolution
- cognitive control
- self-control
- moral decision making
- conflict
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience