An Interdisciplinary Dialogue with the Business and Human Rights Literature

Sufyan Droubi (Lead / Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The article draws on scholarships in the areas of international law, inequality and energy justice to engage in a dialogue with the business and human rights literature, from the perspective of the global south and Latin America, in particular. It engages with Gwynne Skinner's monograph about overcoming barriers to judicial remedy for corporate abuses of human rights. Skinner argues that if victims of these abuses cannot secure remedy in the countries in which the abuses occur – because of weak or corrupt institutions, among other factors – then the victims have a right to remedy in the home countries of the corporations and in countries in which they may conduct business – specifically, the United States, Canada and Europe. Skinner recommends that new legislation be introduced in these countries to ensure that their courts have jurisdiction to hear cases, under international human rights law, even when the cases have little or no links with the forum countries. I argue that a more robust international law and interdisciplinary approach shows that international human rights law alone provides a weak basis for the recommendations. I also reflect on part of the narrative that supports Skinner's argument, which builds a negative image of the courts in developing countries, to argue that this is unnecessary and that expansions of the bases of jurisdiction should be implemented on specific and stronger reasons.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)64-96
Number of pages33
JournalIsrael Law Review
Volume55
Issue number1
Early online date4 Feb 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Mar 2022

Keywords

  • business and human rights
  • right to remedy
  • extraterritorial jurisdiction
  • inequality
  • energy justice
  • just framework

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An Interdisciplinary Dialogue with the Business and Human Rights Literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this