An investigation into the lexical boost with nonhead nouns

Maria Nella Carminati (Lead / Corresponding author), Roger P. G. van Gompel, Laura J. Wakeford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In five structural priming experiments, we investigated lexical boost effects in the production of ditransitive sentences. Although the residual activation model of Pickering and Branigan (1998) suggests that a lexical boost should only occur with the repetition of a syntactic licensing head in ditransitive prepositional object (PO)/double object (DO) structures, Scheepers, Raffray, and Myachykov (2017) recently found that it also occurs with the repetition of nouns that are not syntactic heads. We manipulated the repetition of the subject (Experiments 1–3), and the verb phrase (VP) internal arguments (i.e., either theme or recipient, Experiments 4–5) in PO/DO structures. In Experiment 2, the verb was also repeated between prime and target, while in the other experiments it was not. Three different tasks for eliciting the target were employed: picture description via the oral completion of a sentence fragment (Experiments 1–2, and 4), oral completion of a sentence fragment with no visual context (Experiment 3), and oral production of a sentence from a given array of words and no visual context (Experiment 5). Priming occurred in all experiments and was stronger when the verb was repeated (Experiment 2) than when it was not (Experiment 1). However, none of the experiments showed evidence that priming was stronger when either the subject or one of the VP-internal arguments was repeated. These findings support the view that structural information is associated with syntactic heads (i.e., the verb), but not with nonheads such as the subject noun and the VP-internal arguments (Pickering & Branigan, 1998).

Original languageEnglish
Article number104031
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume108
Early online date9 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Head
experiment
Experiments
Licensure
Syntactics
Experiment
Nouns
activation
recipient
Chemical activation

Keywords

  • Language production
  • Lexical boost
  • Structural priming
  • Syntactic head

Cite this

Carminati, Maria Nella ; van Gompel, Roger P. G. ; Wakeford, Laura J. / An investigation into the lexical boost with nonhead nouns. In: Journal of Memory and Language. 2019 ; Vol. 108. pp. 1-19.
@article{ab8c30ba62f74cffbe2ba78ef36ee1f8,
title = "An investigation into the lexical boost with nonhead nouns",
abstract = "In five structural priming experiments, we investigated lexical boost effects in the production of ditransitive sentences. Although the residual activation model of Pickering and Branigan (1998) suggests that a lexical boost should only occur with the repetition of a syntactic licensing head in ditransitive prepositional object (PO)/double object (DO) structures, Scheepers, Raffray, and Myachykov (2017) recently found that it also occurs with the repetition of nouns that are not syntactic heads. We manipulated the repetition of the subject (Experiments 1–3), and the verb phrase (VP) internal arguments (i.e., either theme or recipient, Experiments 4–5) in PO/DO structures. In Experiment 2, the verb was also repeated between prime and target, while in the other experiments it was not. Three different tasks for eliciting the target were employed: picture description via the oral completion of a sentence fragment (Experiments 1–2, and 4), oral completion of a sentence fragment with no visual context (Experiment 3), and oral production of a sentence from a given array of words and no visual context (Experiment 5). Priming occurred in all experiments and was stronger when the verb was repeated (Experiment 2) than when it was not (Experiment 1). However, none of the experiments showed evidence that priming was stronger when either the subject or one of the VP-internal arguments was repeated. These findings support the view that structural information is associated with syntactic heads (i.e., the verb), but not with nonheads such as the subject noun and the VP-internal arguments (Pickering & Branigan, 1998).",
keywords = "Language production, Lexical boost, Structural priming, Syntactic head",
author = "Carminati, {Maria Nella} and {van Gompel}, {Roger P. G.} and Wakeford, {Laura J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.jml.2019.104031",
language = "English",
volume = "108",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

An investigation into the lexical boost with nonhead nouns. / Carminati, Maria Nella (Lead / Corresponding author); van Gompel, Roger P. G.; Wakeford, Laura J.

In: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 108, 104031, 10.2019, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An investigation into the lexical boost with nonhead nouns

AU - Carminati, Maria Nella

AU - van Gompel, Roger P. G.

AU - Wakeford, Laura J.

PY - 2019/10

Y1 - 2019/10

N2 - In five structural priming experiments, we investigated lexical boost effects in the production of ditransitive sentences. Although the residual activation model of Pickering and Branigan (1998) suggests that a lexical boost should only occur with the repetition of a syntactic licensing head in ditransitive prepositional object (PO)/double object (DO) structures, Scheepers, Raffray, and Myachykov (2017) recently found that it also occurs with the repetition of nouns that are not syntactic heads. We manipulated the repetition of the subject (Experiments 1–3), and the verb phrase (VP) internal arguments (i.e., either theme or recipient, Experiments 4–5) in PO/DO structures. In Experiment 2, the verb was also repeated between prime and target, while in the other experiments it was not. Three different tasks for eliciting the target were employed: picture description via the oral completion of a sentence fragment (Experiments 1–2, and 4), oral completion of a sentence fragment with no visual context (Experiment 3), and oral production of a sentence from a given array of words and no visual context (Experiment 5). Priming occurred in all experiments and was stronger when the verb was repeated (Experiment 2) than when it was not (Experiment 1). However, none of the experiments showed evidence that priming was stronger when either the subject or one of the VP-internal arguments was repeated. These findings support the view that structural information is associated with syntactic heads (i.e., the verb), but not with nonheads such as the subject noun and the VP-internal arguments (Pickering & Branigan, 1998).

AB - In five structural priming experiments, we investigated lexical boost effects in the production of ditransitive sentences. Although the residual activation model of Pickering and Branigan (1998) suggests that a lexical boost should only occur with the repetition of a syntactic licensing head in ditransitive prepositional object (PO)/double object (DO) structures, Scheepers, Raffray, and Myachykov (2017) recently found that it also occurs with the repetition of nouns that are not syntactic heads. We manipulated the repetition of the subject (Experiments 1–3), and the verb phrase (VP) internal arguments (i.e., either theme or recipient, Experiments 4–5) in PO/DO structures. In Experiment 2, the verb was also repeated between prime and target, while in the other experiments it was not. Three different tasks for eliciting the target were employed: picture description via the oral completion of a sentence fragment (Experiments 1–2, and 4), oral completion of a sentence fragment with no visual context (Experiment 3), and oral production of a sentence from a given array of words and no visual context (Experiment 5). Priming occurred in all experiments and was stronger when the verb was repeated (Experiment 2) than when it was not (Experiment 1). However, none of the experiments showed evidence that priming was stronger when either the subject or one of the VP-internal arguments was repeated. These findings support the view that structural information is associated with syntactic heads (i.e., the verb), but not with nonheads such as the subject noun and the VP-internal arguments (Pickering & Branigan, 1998).

KW - Language production

KW - Lexical boost

KW - Structural priming

KW - Syntactic head

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068516121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2019.104031

DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2019.104031

M3 - Article

VL - 108

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

M1 - 104031

ER -