TY - JOUR
T1 - Analysis of terrestrial planet formation by the grand tack model
T2 - system architecture and tack location
AU - Brasser, R.
AU - Matsumura, S.
AU - Ida, S.
AU - Mojzsis, S. J.
AU - Werner, S. C.
N1 - R.B. is grateful for financial support from the Astrobiology Center Project of the National Institutes of Natural Sciences (NINS) grant number AB271017, and to the Daiwa Anglo-Japanese Foundation for a Small Grant. R.B. and S.J.M. acknowledge the John Templeton Foundation—Ffame Origins program in support of CRiO. S.J.M. is grateful for support by the NASA Exobiology Program (NNH14ZDA001N-EXO). S.C.W. is supported by the Research Council of Norway (235058/F20 CRATER CLOCK) and through the Centres of Excellence funding scheme, project number 223272 (CEED). Numerical simulations were in part carried out on the PC cluster at the Center for Computational Astrophysics, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.
PY - 2016/4/12
Y1 - 2016/4/12
N2 - The Grand Tack model of terrestrial planet formation has emerged in recent years as the premier scenario used to account for several observed features of the inner solar system. It relies on the early migration of the giant planets to gravitationally sculpt and mix the planetesimal disk down to ∼1 au, after which the terrestrial planets accrete from material remaining in a narrow circumsolar annulus. Here, we investigate how the model fares under a range of initial conditions and migration course-change ("tack") locations. We run a large number of N-body simulations with tack locations of 1.5 and 2 au and test initial conditions using equal-mass planetary embryos and a semi-analytical approach to oligarchic growth. We make use of a recent model of the protosolar disk that takes into account viscous heating, includes the full effect of type 1 migration, and employs a realistic mass-radius relation for the growing terrestrial planets. Our results show that the canonical tack location of Jupiter at 1.5 au is inconsistent with the most massive planet residing at 1 au at greater than 95% confidence. This favors a tack farther out at 2 au for the disk model and parameters employed. Of the different initial conditions, we find that the oligarchic case is capable of statistically reproducing the orbital architecture and mass distribution of the terrestrial planets, while the equal-mass embryo case is not.
AB - The Grand Tack model of terrestrial planet formation has emerged in recent years as the premier scenario used to account for several observed features of the inner solar system. It relies on the early migration of the giant planets to gravitationally sculpt and mix the planetesimal disk down to ∼1 au, after which the terrestrial planets accrete from material remaining in a narrow circumsolar annulus. Here, we investigate how the model fares under a range of initial conditions and migration course-change ("tack") locations. We run a large number of N-body simulations with tack locations of 1.5 and 2 au and test initial conditions using equal-mass planetary embryos and a semi-analytical approach to oligarchic growth. We make use of a recent model of the protosolar disk that takes into account viscous heating, includes the full effect of type 1 migration, and employs a realistic mass-radius relation for the growing terrestrial planets. Our results show that the canonical tack location of Jupiter at 1.5 au is inconsistent with the most massive planet residing at 1 au at greater than 95% confidence. This favors a tack farther out at 2 au for the disk model and parameters employed. Of the different initial conditions, we find that the oligarchic case is capable of statistically reproducing the orbital architecture and mass distribution of the terrestrial planets, while the equal-mass embryo case is not.
KW - planets and satellites: formation
KW - planets and satellites: terrestrial planets
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969627339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/75
DO - 10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/75
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84969627339
SN - 0004-637X
VL - 821
JO - Astrophysical Journal
JF - Astrophysical Journal
IS - 75
ER -