Analysis of terrestrial planet formation by the grand tack model: system architecture and tack location

R. Brasser, S. Matsumura, S. Ida, S. J. Mojzsis, S. C. Werner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)
144 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Grand Tack model of terrestrial planet formation has emerged in recent years as the premier scenario used to account for several observed features of the inner solar system. It relies on the early migration of the giant planets to gravitationally sculpt and mix the planetesimal disk down to ∼1 au, after which the terrestrial planets accrete from material remaining in a narrow circumsolar annulus. Here, we investigate how the model fares under a range of initial conditions and migration course-change ("tack") locations. We run a large number of N-body simulations with tack locations of 1.5 and 2 au and test initial conditions using equal-mass planetary embryos and a semi-analytical approach to oligarchic growth. We make use of a recent model of the protosolar disk that takes into account viscous heating, includes the full effect of type 1 migration, and employs a realistic mass-radius relation for the growing terrestrial planets. Our results show that the canonical tack location of Jupiter at 1.5 au is inconsistent with the most massive planet residing at 1 au at greater than 95% confidence. This favors a tack farther out at 2 au for the disk model and parameters employed. Of the different initial conditions, we find that the oligarchic case is capable of statistically reproducing the orbital architecture and mass distribution of the terrestrial planets, while the equal-mass embryo case is not.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages18
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume821
Issue number75
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Apr 2016

Keywords

  • planets and satellites: formation
  • planets and satellites: terrestrial planets

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of terrestrial planet formation by the grand tack model: system architecture and tack location'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this