Anderson v Dredd [2137] Mega-City LR 1

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
137 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Administrative—judgment on the nature of judgment—conflict between Judges in judicial practice—claimant (Judge Anderson) challenges the judicial capacity of respondent (Judge Dredd)—claimant open and fluid in judicial style—respondent certain and authoritative in judicial style—insights from Psi Division on the role of judgment in the universe—whether respondent is a good judge—whether judgment closes down meaning—whether respondent is inhuman—whether judges are inhuman—whether judging is horrific—insight from twentieth century fiction on the place of humans in the universe—horror of HP Lovecraft—suppression of horrific cosmic context within judicial institution—suppression for the good of society.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)389-405
Number of pages25
JournalInternational Journal for the Semiotics of Law
Volume30
Issue number3
Early online date15 Sep 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017

Fingerprint

megacity
twentieth century

Keywords

  • Legal Personhood
  • Legal Text
  • Justice Department
  • Sexual Body
  • Judicial Process

Cite this

@article{5bb99cac9bd241f6bfab229b1455fa2d,
title = "Anderson v Dredd [2137] Mega-City LR 1",
abstract = "Administrative—judgment on the nature of judgment—conflict between Judges in judicial practice—claimant (Judge Anderson) challenges the judicial capacity of respondent (Judge Dredd)—claimant open and fluid in judicial style—respondent certain and authoritative in judicial style—insights from Psi Division on the role of judgment in the universe—whether respondent is a good judge—whether judgment closes down meaning—whether respondent is inhuman—whether judges are inhuman—whether judging is horrific—insight from twentieth century fiction on the place of humans in the universe—horror of HP Lovecraft—suppression of horrific cosmic context within judicial institution—suppression for the good of society.",
keywords = "Legal Personhood, Legal Text, Justice Department, Sexual Body, Judicial Process",
author = "Thomas Giddens",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11196-016-9492-7",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "389--405",
journal = "International Journal for the Semiotics of Law",
issn = "0952-8059",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

Anderson v Dredd [2137] Mega-City LR 1. / Giddens, Thomas.

In: International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, Vol. 30, No. 3, 09.2017, p. 389-405.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anderson v Dredd [2137] Mega-City LR 1

AU - Giddens, Thomas

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - Administrative—judgment on the nature of judgment—conflict between Judges in judicial practice—claimant (Judge Anderson) challenges the judicial capacity of respondent (Judge Dredd)—claimant open and fluid in judicial style—respondent certain and authoritative in judicial style—insights from Psi Division on the role of judgment in the universe—whether respondent is a good judge—whether judgment closes down meaning—whether respondent is inhuman—whether judges are inhuman—whether judging is horrific—insight from twentieth century fiction on the place of humans in the universe—horror of HP Lovecraft—suppression of horrific cosmic context within judicial institution—suppression for the good of society.

AB - Administrative—judgment on the nature of judgment—conflict between Judges in judicial practice—claimant (Judge Anderson) challenges the judicial capacity of respondent (Judge Dredd)—claimant open and fluid in judicial style—respondent certain and authoritative in judicial style—insights from Psi Division on the role of judgment in the universe—whether respondent is a good judge—whether judgment closes down meaning—whether respondent is inhuman—whether judges are inhuman—whether judging is horrific—insight from twentieth century fiction on the place of humans in the universe—horror of HP Lovecraft—suppression of horrific cosmic context within judicial institution—suppression for the good of society.

KW - Legal Personhood

KW - Legal Text

KW - Justice Department

KW - Sexual Body

KW - Judicial Process

U2 - 10.1007/s11196-016-9492-7

DO - 10.1007/s11196-016-9492-7

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 389

EP - 405

JO - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law

JF - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law

SN - 0952-8059

IS - 3

ER -