Anderson v Dredd [2137] Mega-City LR 1

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
208 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Administrative—judgment on the nature of judgment—conflict between Judges in judicial practice—claimant (Judge Anderson) challenges the judicial capacity of respondent (Judge Dredd)—claimant open and fluid in judicial style—respondent certain and authoritative in judicial style—insights from Psi Division on the role of judgment in the universe—whether respondent is a good judge—whether judgment closes down meaning—whether respondent is inhuman—whether judges are inhuman—whether judging is horrific—insight from twentieth century fiction on the place of humans in the universe—horror of HP Lovecraft—suppression of horrific cosmic context within judicial institution—suppression for the good of society.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)389-405
Number of pages25
JournalInternational Journal for the Semiotics of Law
Volume30
Issue number3
Early online date15 Sep 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Legal Personhood
  • Legal Text
  • Justice Department
  • Sexual Body
  • Judicial Process

Cite this