Annotating Argument Schemes

Jacky Visser (Lead / Corresponding author), John Lawrence, Chris Reed, Jean Wagemans, Douglas Walton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
119 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Argument schemes are abstractions substantiating the inferential connection between premise(s) and conclusion in argumentative communication. Identifying such conventional patterns of reasoning is essential to the interpretation and evaluation of argumentation. Whether studying argumentation from a theory-driven or data-driven perspective, insight into the actual use of argumentation in communicative practice is essential. Large and reliably annotated corpora of argumentative discourse to quantitatively provide such insight are few and far between. This is all the more true for argument scheme corpora, which tend to suffer from a combination of limited size, poor validation, and the use of ad hoc restricted typologies. In the current paper, we describe the annotation of schemes on the basis of two distinct classifications: Walton’s taxonomy of argument schemes, and Wagemans’ Periodic Table of Arguments. We describe the annotation procedure for each, and the quantitative characteristics of the resulting annotated text corpora. In doing so, we extend the annotation of the preexisting US2016 corpus of televised election debates, resulting in, to the best of our knowledge, the two largest consistently annotated corpora of schemes in argumentative dialogue publicly available. Based on evaluation in terms of inter-annotator agreement, we propose further improvements to the guidelines for annotating schemes: the argument scheme key, and the Argument Type Identification Procedure.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages40
JournalArgumentation
Early online date7 May 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 7 May 2020

Keywords

  • Annotation
  • Argument Type Identification Procedure (ATIP)
  • Argument scheme
  • Argument scheme key (ASK)
  • Argumentation scheme
  • Corpus
  • Election debates
  • Periodic table of arguments

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Annotating Argument Schemes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this