Anti-dialogic positioning in change stories

Bank robbers, saviours and peons

Nic Beech, Stacy A. MacPhail, Christine Coupland

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    12 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Stories people tell of going through change incorporate and react to others around them. Positions can be taken in stories that tend towards the monological, having a singular perspective and being somewhat sealed off from others. Alternatively, stories can tend towards the dialogical, a multiple, less certain and more interactive mode. We explore multiple stories of an organizational change and analyse a paradoxical situation that emerges. We argue that although the stories may have the appearance of being dialogical, they can be seen as co-existing but self-sealing, or anti-dialogic. We introduce an interruption to the story and discuss a possibility for challenging anti-dialogic positioning in change stories.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)335-352
    Number of pages18
    JournalOrganization Studies
    Volume16
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2009

    Fingerprint

    Positioning
    Interruption
    Organizational change

    Keywords

    • Dialogue
    • Fantasy
    • Insulating identity work
    • Self-sealing stories

    Cite this

    Beech, Nic ; MacPhail, Stacy A. ; Coupland, Christine. / Anti-dialogic positioning in change stories : Bank robbers, saviours and peons. In: Organization Studies. 2009 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 335-352.
    @article{297b894dac0742c4ab1ad9bb5fd75730,
    title = "Anti-dialogic positioning in change stories: Bank robbers, saviours and peons",
    abstract = "Stories people tell of going through change incorporate and react to others around them. Positions can be taken in stories that tend towards the monological, having a singular perspective and being somewhat sealed off from others. Alternatively, stories can tend towards the dialogical, a multiple, less certain and more interactive mode. We explore multiple stories of an organizational change and analyse a paradoxical situation that emerges. We argue that although the stories may have the appearance of being dialogical, they can be seen as co-existing but self-sealing, or anti-dialogic. We introduce an interruption to the story and discuss a possibility for challenging anti-dialogic positioning in change stories.",
    keywords = "Dialogue, Fantasy, Insulating identity work, Self-sealing stories",
    author = "Nic Beech and MacPhail, {Stacy A.} and Christine Coupland",
    year = "2009",
    month = "5",
    doi = "10.1177/1350508409102299",
    language = "English",
    volume = "16",
    pages = "335--352",
    journal = "Organization Studies",
    issn = "0170-8406",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications",
    number = "3",

    }

    Anti-dialogic positioning in change stories : Bank robbers, saviours and peons. / Beech, Nic; MacPhail, Stacy A.; Coupland, Christine.

    In: Organization Studies, Vol. 16, No. 3, 05.2009, p. 335-352.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Anti-dialogic positioning in change stories

    T2 - Bank robbers, saviours and peons

    AU - Beech, Nic

    AU - MacPhail, Stacy A.

    AU - Coupland, Christine

    PY - 2009/5

    Y1 - 2009/5

    N2 - Stories people tell of going through change incorporate and react to others around them. Positions can be taken in stories that tend towards the monological, having a singular perspective and being somewhat sealed off from others. Alternatively, stories can tend towards the dialogical, a multiple, less certain and more interactive mode. We explore multiple stories of an organizational change and analyse a paradoxical situation that emerges. We argue that although the stories may have the appearance of being dialogical, they can be seen as co-existing but self-sealing, or anti-dialogic. We introduce an interruption to the story and discuss a possibility for challenging anti-dialogic positioning in change stories.

    AB - Stories people tell of going through change incorporate and react to others around them. Positions can be taken in stories that tend towards the monological, having a singular perspective and being somewhat sealed off from others. Alternatively, stories can tend towards the dialogical, a multiple, less certain and more interactive mode. We explore multiple stories of an organizational change and analyse a paradoxical situation that emerges. We argue that although the stories may have the appearance of being dialogical, they can be seen as co-existing but self-sealing, or anti-dialogic. We introduce an interruption to the story and discuss a possibility for challenging anti-dialogic positioning in change stories.

    KW - Dialogue

    KW - Fantasy

    KW - Insulating identity work

    KW - Self-sealing stories

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65249179706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/1350508409102299

    DO - 10.1177/1350508409102299

    M3 - Article

    VL - 16

    SP - 335

    EP - 352

    JO - Organization Studies

    JF - Organization Studies

    SN - 0170-8406

    IS - 3

    ER -