TY - JOUR
T1 - Application of the QDa-Md method of environmental discrimination to particle size analyses of fine sediments by pipette and SediGraph methods
T2 - a comparative study
AU - Duck, R. W.
PY - 1994
Y1 - 1994
N2 - The results of particle size analyses by the low-technology pipette method and by the modern SediGraph, of a suite of fine lacustrine bottom sediment samples, are compared. Good correlations between the two data sets are observed, although the SediGraph consistently indicates finer grain sizes and better sorting of distributions. The QDa-Md method of environmental discrimination, originally established on the basis of traditional methods of size analysis, is found to be sufficiently versatile to accommodate the SediGraph data into the appropriate trend envelopes, despite the considerable differences in derived grain size parameters.
AB - The results of particle size analyses by the low-technology pipette method and by the modern SediGraph, of a suite of fine lacustrine bottom sediment samples, are compared. Good correlations between the two data sets are observed, although the SediGraph consistently indicates finer grain sizes and better sorting of distributions. The QDa-Md method of environmental discrimination, originally established on the basis of traditional methods of size analysis, is found to be sufficiently versatile to accommodate the SediGraph data into the appropriate trend envelopes, despite the considerable differences in derived grain size parameters.
U2 - 10.1002/esp.3290190605
DO - 10.1002/esp.3290190605
M3 - Article
SN - 1096-9837
VL - 19
SP - 525
EP - 529
JO - Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
JF - Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
IS - 6
ER -