Appraisal of public spending in the development process

T. A. Jackson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    As demonstrated in this review, appraisers of public sector investment projects do not simply search for efficient ways to deliver the goals set by policy-makers. They routinely make their own value judgements about project goals and the development process, both implicitly through the methodology applied and explicitly in their interpretation of the findings. Case studies in the use of cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis and in the new tools of environmental assessment demonstrate that appraisal is least effective when it pretends to be value-free and resists attempts to explore its underlying assumptions. A robust assessment process should instead be transparent and defensible, allowing the values on which it is based to be identified and subject to scrutiny. This is particularly important when tackling the challenge of climate change. Given the scale of public spending commitments needed for delivering a low-carbon economy, appraisers must play a crucial role in ensuring that the non-monetised environmental elements of new investments are adequately assessed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)205-214
    Number of pages10
    JournalProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Urban Design and Planning
    Volume164
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2011

    Fingerprint

    public spending
    value judgement
    environmental assessment
    public sector
    Climate change
    Values
    climate change
    commitment
    interpretation
    Carbon
    economy
    methodology
    carbon
    costs
    Costs
    appraisal
    project
    analysis
    cost-benefit
    policy

    Cite this

    @article{99e97b73ffcd4d8bb8f1ecf98b1189dc,
    title = "Appraisal of public spending in the development process",
    abstract = "As demonstrated in this review, appraisers of public sector investment projects do not simply search for efficient ways to deliver the goals set by policy-makers. They routinely make their own value judgements about project goals and the development process, both implicitly through the methodology applied and explicitly in their interpretation of the findings. Case studies in the use of cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis and in the new tools of environmental assessment demonstrate that appraisal is least effective when it pretends to be value-free and resists attempts to explore its underlying assumptions. A robust assessment process should instead be transparent and defensible, allowing the values on which it is based to be identified and subject to scrutiny. This is particularly important when tackling the challenge of climate change. Given the scale of public spending commitments needed for delivering a low-carbon economy, appraisers must play a crucial role in ensuring that the non-monetised environmental elements of new investments are adequately assessed.",
    author = "Jackson, {T. A.}",
    note = "Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
    year = "2011",
    month = "12",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1680/udap.2011.164.4.205",
    language = "English",
    volume = "164",
    pages = "205--214",
    journal = "Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Urban Design and Planning",
    issn = "1755-0793",
    publisher = "Thomas Telford",
    number = "4",

    }

    Appraisal of public spending in the development process. / Jackson, T. A.

    In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Urban Design and Planning, Vol. 164, No. 4, 01.12.2011, p. 205-214.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Appraisal of public spending in the development process

    AU - Jackson, T. A.

    N1 - Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

    PY - 2011/12/1

    Y1 - 2011/12/1

    N2 - As demonstrated in this review, appraisers of public sector investment projects do not simply search for efficient ways to deliver the goals set by policy-makers. They routinely make their own value judgements about project goals and the development process, both implicitly through the methodology applied and explicitly in their interpretation of the findings. Case studies in the use of cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis and in the new tools of environmental assessment demonstrate that appraisal is least effective when it pretends to be value-free and resists attempts to explore its underlying assumptions. A robust assessment process should instead be transparent and defensible, allowing the values on which it is based to be identified and subject to scrutiny. This is particularly important when tackling the challenge of climate change. Given the scale of public spending commitments needed for delivering a low-carbon economy, appraisers must play a crucial role in ensuring that the non-monetised environmental elements of new investments are adequately assessed.

    AB - As demonstrated in this review, appraisers of public sector investment projects do not simply search for efficient ways to deliver the goals set by policy-makers. They routinely make their own value judgements about project goals and the development process, both implicitly through the methodology applied and explicitly in their interpretation of the findings. Case studies in the use of cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis and in the new tools of environmental assessment demonstrate that appraisal is least effective when it pretends to be value-free and resists attempts to explore its underlying assumptions. A robust assessment process should instead be transparent and defensible, allowing the values on which it is based to be identified and subject to scrutiny. This is particularly important when tackling the challenge of climate change. Given the scale of public spending commitments needed for delivering a low-carbon economy, appraisers must play a crucial role in ensuring that the non-monetised environmental elements of new investments are adequately assessed.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82355190752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1680/udap.2011.164.4.205

    DO - 10.1680/udap.2011.164.4.205

    M3 - Article

    VL - 164

    SP - 205

    EP - 214

    JO - Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Urban Design and Planning

    JF - Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Urban Design and Planning

    SN - 1755-0793

    IS - 4

    ER -