Appraisal of traditional and recently proposed relationships between the hard and soft dimensions of the nose in profile

Christopher Rynn, Caroline M. Wilkinson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    46 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper tests six methods of predicting external nasal profile proportions, using the form and dimensions of the bony nasal (piriform) aperture. A sample of 122 lateral cephalograms was measured and traced before each method was attempted, under blind conditions where appropriate. Error was assessed by comparing predicted to actual proportions. Methods used by the following authors were tested: Krogman and Iscan ([1986] The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine, Springfield: G.G. Thomas), Gerasimov ([1955] The Reconstruction of the Face on the Skull), Prokopec and Ubelaker ([2002] Forensic Sci. Commun. 4:1-4), Macho ([1986] J. Forensic Sci. 31:1391-1403), George ([1987] J. Forensic Sci. 32:1305-1330), and Stephan et al. ([2003] Am J. Phys. Anthropol. 122:240-250). The two-tangent method by Gerasimov ([1955] The Reconstruction of the Face on the Skull) was found to perform best at predicting a point on the nasal tip on male and female preoperative subjects. The method of Krogman and Iscan ([1986] The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine, Springfield: G.G. Thomas) performed poorly, as did the nasal profile determination method (Prokopec and Ubelaker [2002] Forensic Sci. Commun. 4:1-4). The other methods, all derived by a process of regression calculations, were shown to perform with variable accuracy on this sample, despite the age range and ethnicity of this sample closely resembling that of the samples from which these methods were derived.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)364-373
    Number of pages10
    JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology
    Volume130
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2006

    Fingerprint

    Nose
    forensic medicine
    Forensic Medicine
    Skull
    Skeleton
    reconstruction
    ethnicity
    regression

    Cite this

    @article{034152a374674786979f1ad452e595d3,
    title = "Appraisal of traditional and recently proposed relationships between the hard and soft dimensions of the nose in profile",
    abstract = "This paper tests six methods of predicting external nasal profile proportions, using the form and dimensions of the bony nasal (piriform) aperture. A sample of 122 lateral cephalograms was measured and traced before each method was attempted, under blind conditions where appropriate. Error was assessed by comparing predicted to actual proportions. Methods used by the following authors were tested: Krogman and Iscan ([1986] The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine, Springfield: G.G. Thomas), Gerasimov ([1955] The Reconstruction of the Face on the Skull), Prokopec and Ubelaker ([2002] Forensic Sci. Commun. 4:1-4), Macho ([1986] J. Forensic Sci. 31:1391-1403), George ([1987] J. Forensic Sci. 32:1305-1330), and Stephan et al. ([2003] Am J. Phys. Anthropol. 122:240-250). The two-tangent method by Gerasimov ([1955] The Reconstruction of the Face on the Skull) was found to perform best at predicting a point on the nasal tip on male and female preoperative subjects. The method of Krogman and Iscan ([1986] The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine, Springfield: G.G. Thomas) performed poorly, as did the nasal profile determination method (Prokopec and Ubelaker [2002] Forensic Sci. Commun. 4:1-4). The other methods, all derived by a process of regression calculations, were shown to perform with variable accuracy on this sample, despite the age range and ethnicity of this sample closely resembling that of the samples from which these methods were derived.",
    author = "Christopher Rynn and Wilkinson, {Caroline M.}",
    note = "MEDLINE{\circledR} is the source for the MeSH terms of this document.",
    year = "2006",
    month = "7",
    doi = "10.1002/ajpa.20337",
    language = "English",
    volume = "130",
    pages = "364--373",
    journal = "American Journal of Physical Anthropology",
    issn = "0002-9483",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "3",

    }

    Appraisal of traditional and recently proposed relationships between the hard and soft dimensions of the nose in profile. / Rynn, Christopher; Wilkinson, Caroline M.

    In: American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 130, No. 3, 07.2006, p. 364-373.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Appraisal of traditional and recently proposed relationships between the hard and soft dimensions of the nose in profile

    AU - Rynn, Christopher

    AU - Wilkinson, Caroline M.

    N1 - MEDLINE® is the source for the MeSH terms of this document.

    PY - 2006/7

    Y1 - 2006/7

    N2 - This paper tests six methods of predicting external nasal profile proportions, using the form and dimensions of the bony nasal (piriform) aperture. A sample of 122 lateral cephalograms was measured and traced before each method was attempted, under blind conditions where appropriate. Error was assessed by comparing predicted to actual proportions. Methods used by the following authors were tested: Krogman and Iscan ([1986] The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine, Springfield: G.G. Thomas), Gerasimov ([1955] The Reconstruction of the Face on the Skull), Prokopec and Ubelaker ([2002] Forensic Sci. Commun. 4:1-4), Macho ([1986] J. Forensic Sci. 31:1391-1403), George ([1987] J. Forensic Sci. 32:1305-1330), and Stephan et al. ([2003] Am J. Phys. Anthropol. 122:240-250). The two-tangent method by Gerasimov ([1955] The Reconstruction of the Face on the Skull) was found to perform best at predicting a point on the nasal tip on male and female preoperative subjects. The method of Krogman and Iscan ([1986] The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine, Springfield: G.G. Thomas) performed poorly, as did the nasal profile determination method (Prokopec and Ubelaker [2002] Forensic Sci. Commun. 4:1-4). The other methods, all derived by a process of regression calculations, were shown to perform with variable accuracy on this sample, despite the age range and ethnicity of this sample closely resembling that of the samples from which these methods were derived.

    AB - This paper tests six methods of predicting external nasal profile proportions, using the form and dimensions of the bony nasal (piriform) aperture. A sample of 122 lateral cephalograms was measured and traced before each method was attempted, under blind conditions where appropriate. Error was assessed by comparing predicted to actual proportions. Methods used by the following authors were tested: Krogman and Iscan ([1986] The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine, Springfield: G.G. Thomas), Gerasimov ([1955] The Reconstruction of the Face on the Skull), Prokopec and Ubelaker ([2002] Forensic Sci. Commun. 4:1-4), Macho ([1986] J. Forensic Sci. 31:1391-1403), George ([1987] J. Forensic Sci. 32:1305-1330), and Stephan et al. ([2003] Am J. Phys. Anthropol. 122:240-250). The two-tangent method by Gerasimov ([1955] The Reconstruction of the Face on the Skull) was found to perform best at predicting a point on the nasal tip on male and female preoperative subjects. The method of Krogman and Iscan ([1986] The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine, Springfield: G.G. Thomas) performed poorly, as did the nasal profile determination method (Prokopec and Ubelaker [2002] Forensic Sci. Commun. 4:1-4). The other methods, all derived by a process of regression calculations, were shown to perform with variable accuracy on this sample, despite the age range and ethnicity of this sample closely resembling that of the samples from which these methods were derived.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33744959405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1002/ajpa.20337

    DO - 10.1002/ajpa.20337

    M3 - Article

    VL - 130

    SP - 364

    EP - 373

    JO - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

    JF - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

    SN - 0002-9483

    IS - 3

    ER -