Approaches to communication assessment with children and adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities

Darren Chadwick, Susan Buell, Juliet Goldbart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Communication assessment of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) has seldom been investigated. Here, we explore approaches and decision making in undertaking communication assessments in this group of people. A questionnaire was sent to UK practitioners. The questionnaire elicited information about assessment approaches used and rationales for assessment choices. Fifty-five speech and language therapists (SLTs) responded. Findings revealed that the Preverbal Communication Schedule, the Affective Communication Assessment and the Checklist of Communication Competence were the most frequently used published assessments. Both published and unpublished assessments were often used. Rationales for assessment choice related to assessment utility, sensitivity to detail and change and their applicability to people with PIMD. Underpinning evidence for assessments was seldom mentioned demonstrating the need for more empirical support for assessments used. Variability in practice and the eclectic use of a range of assessments was evident, underpinned by practice-focused evidence based on tacit knowledge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)336-358
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Volume32
Issue number2
Early online date14 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

multiple disabilities
Intellectual Disability
Communication
communication
Evidence-Based Practice
Checklist
Mental Competency
Decision Making
Appointments and Schedules
Language
questionnaire
therapist
evidence

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Child
  • Communication Disorders/diagnosis
  • Disabled Persons/statistics & numerical data
  • Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Intellectual Disability/complications
  • Language Tests/statistics & numerical data
  • Language Therapy/statistics & numerical data
  • Speech Therapy/statistics & numerical data
  • United Kingdom

Cite this

@article{0de0b166460b4cdd893975600c6251f3,
title = "Approaches to communication assessment with children and adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities",
abstract = "Communication assessment of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) has seldom been investigated. Here, we explore approaches and decision making in undertaking communication assessments in this group of people. A questionnaire was sent to UK practitioners. The questionnaire elicited information about assessment approaches used and rationales for assessment choices. Fifty-five speech and language therapists (SLTs) responded. Findings revealed that the Preverbal Communication Schedule, the Affective Communication Assessment and the Checklist of Communication Competence were the most frequently used published assessments. Both published and unpublished assessments were often used. Rationales for assessment choice related to assessment utility, sensitivity to detail and change and their applicability to people with PIMD. Underpinning evidence for assessments was seldom mentioned demonstrating the need for more empirical support for assessments used. Variability in practice and the eclectic use of a range of assessments was evident, underpinned by practice-focused evidence based on tacit knowledge.",
keywords = "Adult, Child, Communication Disorders/diagnosis, Disabled Persons/statistics & numerical data, Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data, Humans, Intellectual Disability/complications, Language Tests/statistics & numerical data, Language Therapy/statistics & numerical data, Speech Therapy/statistics & numerical data, United Kingdom",
author = "Darren Chadwick and Susan Buell and Juliet Goldbart",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jar.12530",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "336--358",
journal = "Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities",
issn = "1468-3148",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "2",

}

Approaches to communication assessment with children and adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. / Chadwick, Darren; Buell, Susan; Goldbart, Juliet.

In: Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 32, No. 2, 01.03.2019, p. 336-358.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Approaches to communication assessment with children and adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities

AU - Chadwick, Darren

AU - Buell, Susan

AU - Goldbart, Juliet

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Communication assessment of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) has seldom been investigated. Here, we explore approaches and decision making in undertaking communication assessments in this group of people. A questionnaire was sent to UK practitioners. The questionnaire elicited information about assessment approaches used and rationales for assessment choices. Fifty-five speech and language therapists (SLTs) responded. Findings revealed that the Preverbal Communication Schedule, the Affective Communication Assessment and the Checklist of Communication Competence were the most frequently used published assessments. Both published and unpublished assessments were often used. Rationales for assessment choice related to assessment utility, sensitivity to detail and change and their applicability to people with PIMD. Underpinning evidence for assessments was seldom mentioned demonstrating the need for more empirical support for assessments used. Variability in practice and the eclectic use of a range of assessments was evident, underpinned by practice-focused evidence based on tacit knowledge.

AB - Communication assessment of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) has seldom been investigated. Here, we explore approaches and decision making in undertaking communication assessments in this group of people. A questionnaire was sent to UK practitioners. The questionnaire elicited information about assessment approaches used and rationales for assessment choices. Fifty-five speech and language therapists (SLTs) responded. Findings revealed that the Preverbal Communication Schedule, the Affective Communication Assessment and the Checklist of Communication Competence were the most frequently used published assessments. Both published and unpublished assessments were often used. Rationales for assessment choice related to assessment utility, sensitivity to detail and change and their applicability to people with PIMD. Underpinning evidence for assessments was seldom mentioned demonstrating the need for more empirical support for assessments used. Variability in practice and the eclectic use of a range of assessments was evident, underpinned by practice-focused evidence based on tacit knowledge.

KW - Adult

KW - Child

KW - Communication Disorders/diagnosis

KW - Disabled Persons/statistics & numerical data

KW - Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data

KW - Humans

KW - Intellectual Disability/complications

KW - Language Tests/statistics & numerical data

KW - Language Therapy/statistics & numerical data

KW - Speech Therapy/statistics & numerical data

KW - United Kingdom

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056483140&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jar.12530

DO - 10.1111/jar.12530

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 336

EP - 358

JO - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

JF - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

SN - 1468-3148

IS - 2

ER -