Are combined orthopaedic and rheumatology clinics worth while?

R. J. Newman, J. Belch, I. G. Kelly, R. D. Sturrock

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The practice of holding combined orthopaedic and rheumatology clinics is widespread, but no attempt has been made to assess their usefulness. In a one year prospective study patients were randomised either to a combined clinic with a rheumatologist and an orthopaedic surgeon or to a clinic with an orthopaedic surgeon alone. The details of the patients' disease, the interview, the surgeons' and rheumatologists' responses, and the patients' opinions were recorded on questionnaires. Interviews were appreciably longer in the combined clinic, and more referrals for surgery were made. The rheumatologist correctly predicted the need for surgery in 95% of cases, and his presence in the clinic was considered desirable by the surgeon, principally when the referral letter was inadequate. It is concluded that most patients with rheumatic diseases can be seen more efficiently in routine orthopaedic clinics provided a good quality letter of referral is sent.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1392-1393
    Number of pages2
    JournalBMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)
    Volume294
    Issue number6584
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1987

    Fingerprint

    Rheumatology
    Orthopedics
    Referral and Consultation
    Interviews
    Rheumatic Diseases
    Prospective Studies
    Rheumatologists
    Orthopedic Surgeons
    Surgeons

    Cite this

    Newman, R. J. ; Belch, J. ; Kelly, I. G. ; Sturrock, R. D. / Are combined orthopaedic and rheumatology clinics worth while?. In: BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.). 1987 ; Vol. 294, No. 6584. pp. 1392-1393.
    @article{1634fc039f5149629b6f9093ab2d1c23,
    title = "Are combined orthopaedic and rheumatology clinics worth while?",
    abstract = "The practice of holding combined orthopaedic and rheumatology clinics is widespread, but no attempt has been made to assess their usefulness. In a one year prospective study patients were randomised either to a combined clinic with a rheumatologist and an orthopaedic surgeon or to a clinic with an orthopaedic surgeon alone. The details of the patients' disease, the interview, the surgeons' and rheumatologists' responses, and the patients' opinions were recorded on questionnaires. Interviews were appreciably longer in the combined clinic, and more referrals for surgery were made. The rheumatologist correctly predicted the need for surgery in 95{\%} of cases, and his presence in the clinic was considered desirable by the surgeon, principally when the referral letter was inadequate. It is concluded that most patients with rheumatic diseases can be seen more efficiently in routine orthopaedic clinics provided a good quality letter of referral is sent.",
    author = "Newman, {R. J.} and J. Belch and Kelly, {I. G.} and Sturrock, {R. D.}",
    year = "1987",
    doi = "10.1136/bmj.294.6584.1392",
    language = "English",
    volume = "294",
    pages = "1392--1393",
    journal = "BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)",
    issn = "0267-0623",
    number = "6584",

    }

    Are combined orthopaedic and rheumatology clinics worth while? / Newman, R. J.; Belch, J.; Kelly, I. G.; Sturrock, R. D.

    In: BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), Vol. 294, No. 6584, 1987, p. 1392-1393.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Are combined orthopaedic and rheumatology clinics worth while?

    AU - Newman, R. J.

    AU - Belch, J.

    AU - Kelly, I. G.

    AU - Sturrock, R. D.

    PY - 1987

    Y1 - 1987

    N2 - The practice of holding combined orthopaedic and rheumatology clinics is widespread, but no attempt has been made to assess their usefulness. In a one year prospective study patients were randomised either to a combined clinic with a rheumatologist and an orthopaedic surgeon or to a clinic with an orthopaedic surgeon alone. The details of the patients' disease, the interview, the surgeons' and rheumatologists' responses, and the patients' opinions were recorded on questionnaires. Interviews were appreciably longer in the combined clinic, and more referrals for surgery were made. The rheumatologist correctly predicted the need for surgery in 95% of cases, and his presence in the clinic was considered desirable by the surgeon, principally when the referral letter was inadequate. It is concluded that most patients with rheumatic diseases can be seen more efficiently in routine orthopaedic clinics provided a good quality letter of referral is sent.

    AB - The practice of holding combined orthopaedic and rheumatology clinics is widespread, but no attempt has been made to assess their usefulness. In a one year prospective study patients were randomised either to a combined clinic with a rheumatologist and an orthopaedic surgeon or to a clinic with an orthopaedic surgeon alone. The details of the patients' disease, the interview, the surgeons' and rheumatologists' responses, and the patients' opinions were recorded on questionnaires. Interviews were appreciably longer in the combined clinic, and more referrals for surgery were made. The rheumatologist correctly predicted the need for surgery in 95% of cases, and his presence in the clinic was considered desirable by the surgeon, principally when the referral letter was inadequate. It is concluded that most patients with rheumatic diseases can be seen more efficiently in routine orthopaedic clinics provided a good quality letter of referral is sent.

    U2 - 10.1136/bmj.294.6584.1392

    DO - 10.1136/bmj.294.6584.1392

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 3109670

    VL - 294

    SP - 1392

    EP - 1393

    JO - BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)

    JF - BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)

    SN - 0267-0623

    IS - 6584

    ER -