Are Moderators Moderate? Testing the ‘Anchoring and Adjustment’ Hypothesis in the Context of Marking Politics Exams

John Garry, M. Alan McCool Jr, Shane O'Neill

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    On the basis of an experiment we confirm the hypothesis – derived from the ‘anchoring and adjustment’ heuristic – that the difference that a moderator makes to the grade awarded by a first marker is less than the difference between the grades awarded by two independent (or ‘double-blind’) markers. We suggest that double-blind marking is therefore more objective and reliable than moderator-based marking, although the former clearly has significantly higher administrative costs than the latter.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)191-200
    Number of pages10
    JournalPolitics
    Volume25
    Issue number3
    Early online date20 Sept 2005
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2005

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Are Moderators Moderate? Testing the ‘Anchoring and Adjustment’ Hypothesis in the Context of Marking Politics Exams'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this