Argument analysis: components of interpersonal argumentation

Katazyna Budzynska

doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-135

Argument analysis: components of interpersonal argumentation

Katazyna Budzynska

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to propose a robust model of interpersonal argumentation (IP). The IP-arguments directly address participants of communication, i.e. they refer to speech acts rather than to propositional contents. Argumentation theory recognizes several IP-arguments, e.g. argument from position to know or ad hominem arguments. The model proposed in the paper enables to describe references to different types of speech acts - not only assertives, but also commissives and directives. The IP-arguments are assumed to be warranted by the component of authorizing an agent to perform a given speech act. Consequently, the wider class of IP-communication can be expressed in the extended model, such as e.g. the structure of generic ad hominem can be explicitly represented as the undercutter. © 2010 The authors and IOS Press. All rights reserved.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Computational Models of Argument
Subtitle of host publication	Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Editors	Pietro Baroni, Federico Cerutti, Massimiliano Giacomin, Guillermo R. Simari
Place of Publication	Amsterdam
Publisher	IOS Press
Pages	135-146
Number of pages	12
ISBN (Electronic)	9781282880498, 9781607506195
ISBN (Print)	9781607506188
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-135
Publication status	Published - 2010
Event	Third International Conference on Computational Models of Argument - Palazzo Todeschini (Todeschini Palace), Desenzano del Garda, Italy Duration: 8 Sept 2010 → 10 Sept 2010 http://www.ing.unibs.it/~comma2010/

Publication series

Name	Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications
Publisher	IOS
Volume	216
ISSN (Print)	0922-6389
ISSN (Electronic)	1879-8314

Conference

Conference	Third International Conference on Computational Models of Argument
Abbreviated title	COMMA 2010
Country/Territory	Italy
City	Desenzano del Garda
Period	8/09/10 → 10/09/10
Internet address	http://www.ing.unibs.it/~comma2010/

Access to Document

10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-135

http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-78049281554&partnerID=40&md5=e46193f5a469692646d868e9e961f41b

Cite this

@inproceedings{bc8d2b783a0349118002ea660c50dd39,

title = "Argument analysis: components of interpersonal argumentation",

abstract = "The aim of the paper is to propose a robust model of interpersonal argumentation (IP). The IP-arguments directly address participants of communication, i.e. they refer to speech acts rather than to propositional contents. Argumentation theory recognizes several IP-arguments, e.g. argument from position to know or ad hominem arguments. The model proposed in the paper enables to describe references to different types of speech acts - not only assertives, but also commissives and directives. The IP-arguments are assumed to be warranted by the component of authorizing an agent to perform a given speech act. Consequently, the wider class of IP-communication can be expressed in the extended model, such as e.g. the structure of generic ad hominem can be explicitly represented as the undercutter. {\textcopyright} 2010 The authors and IOS Press. All rights reserved.",

author = "Katazyna Budzynska",

year = "2010",

doi = "10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-135",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781607506188 ",

series = "Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications",

publisher = "IOS Press",

pages = "135--146",

editor = "Baroni, \{Pietro \} and Federico Cerutti and Massimiliano Giacomin and Simari, \{Guillermo R.\}",

booktitle = "Computational Models of Argument",

address = "Netherlands",

note = "Third International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, COMMA 2010 ; Conference date: 08-09-2010 Through 10-09-2010",

url = "http://www.ing.unibs.it/\textasciitilde{}comma2010/",

}

Budzynska, K 2010, Argument analysis: components of interpersonal argumentation. in P Baroni, F Cerutti, M Giacomin & GR Simari (eds), Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications, vol. 216, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 135-146, Third International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, Desenzano del Garda, Italy, 8/09/10. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-135

Argument analysis: components of interpersonal argumentation. / Budzynska, Katazyna.
Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. ed. / Pietro Baroni; Federico Cerutti; Massimiliano Giacomin; Guillermo R. Simari. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2010. p. 135-146 (Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications; Vol. 216).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Argument analysis

T2 - Third International Conference on Computational Models of Argument

AU - Budzynska, Katazyna

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The aim of the paper is to propose a robust model of interpersonal argumentation (IP). The IP-arguments directly address participants of communication, i.e. they refer to speech acts rather than to propositional contents. Argumentation theory recognizes several IP-arguments, e.g. argument from position to know or ad hominem arguments. The model proposed in the paper enables to describe references to different types of speech acts - not only assertives, but also commissives and directives. The IP-arguments are assumed to be warranted by the component of authorizing an agent to perform a given speech act. Consequently, the wider class of IP-communication can be expressed in the extended model, such as e.g. the structure of generic ad hominem can be explicitly represented as the undercutter. © 2010 The authors and IOS Press. All rights reserved.

AB - The aim of the paper is to propose a robust model of interpersonal argumentation (IP). The IP-arguments directly address participants of communication, i.e. they refer to speech acts rather than to propositional contents. Argumentation theory recognizes several IP-arguments, e.g. argument from position to know or ad hominem arguments. The model proposed in the paper enables to describe references to different types of speech acts - not only assertives, but also commissives and directives. The IP-arguments are assumed to be warranted by the component of authorizing an agent to perform a given speech act. Consequently, the wider class of IP-communication can be expressed in the extended model, such as e.g. the structure of generic ad hominem can be explicitly represented as the undercutter. © 2010 The authors and IOS Press. All rights reserved.

U2 - 10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-135

DO - 10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-135

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781607506188

T3 - Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications

SP - 135

EP - 146

BT - Computational Models of Argument

A2 - Baroni, Pietro

A2 - Cerutti, Federico

A2 - Giacomin, Massimiliano

A2 - Simari, Guillermo R.

PB - IOS Press

CY - Amsterdam

Y2 - 8 September 2010 through 10 September 2010

ER -

Argument analysis: components of interpersonal argumentation

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this