Argumentation in the 2016 US Presidential Elections

Annotated corpora of television debates and social media reaction

Jacobus Visser (Lead / Corresponding author), Barbara Konat, Rory Duthie, Marcin Koszowy, Katarzyna Budzynska, Chris Reed

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper we present US2016, the largest publicly available set of corpora of annotated dialogical argumentation. The annotation covers argumentative relations, dialogue acts and pragmatic features. The corpora comprise transcriptions of television debates leading up to the 2016 US presidential elections, and reactions to the debates on Reddit. These two constitutive parts of the corpora are integrated by means of the intertextual correspondence between them. The rhetorical richness and high argument density of the communicative context results in cross-genre corpora that are robust resources for the study of the dialogical dynamics of argumentation in three ways: first, in empirical strands of research in discourse analysis and argumentation studies; second, in the burgeoning field of argument mining where automatic techniques require such data; and third, in formulating algorithmic techniques for sensemaking through the development of Argument Analytics.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages32
JournalLanguage Resources and Evaluation
Early online date9 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

presidential election
argumentation
social media
television
discourse analysis
genre
pragmatics
dialogue
resources
Presidential Elections
Argumentation
Social Media

Keywords

  • Argumentation
  • Corpus
  • Intertextual correspondence
  • Political discourse
  • Reddit
  • Television debate
  • US elections

Cite this

@article{19d3015743434675ab1ff168a54ce169,
title = "Argumentation in the 2016 US Presidential Elections: Annotated corpora of television debates and social media reaction",
abstract = "In this paper we present US2016, the largest publicly available set of corpora of annotated dialogical argumentation. The annotation covers argumentative relations, dialogue acts and pragmatic features. The corpora comprise transcriptions of television debates leading up to the 2016 US presidential elections, and reactions to the debates on Reddit. These two constitutive parts of the corpora are integrated by means of the intertextual correspondence between them. The rhetorical richness and high argument density of the communicative context results in cross-genre corpora that are robust resources for the study of the dialogical dynamics of argumentation in three ways: first, in empirical strands of research in discourse analysis and argumentation studies; second, in the burgeoning field of argument mining where automatic techniques require such data; and third, in formulating algorithmic techniques for sensemaking through the development of Argument Analytics.",
keywords = "Argumentation, Corpus, Intertextual correspondence, Political discourse, Reddit, Television debate, US elections",
author = "Jacobus Visser and Barbara Konat and Rory Duthie and Marcin Koszowy and Katarzyna Budzynska and Chris Reed",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s10579-019-09446-8",
language = "English",
journal = "Language Resources and Evaluation",
issn = "1574-020X",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Argumentation in the 2016 US Presidential Elections

T2 - Annotated corpora of television debates and social media reaction

AU - Visser, Jacobus

AU - Konat, Barbara

AU - Duthie, Rory

AU - Koszowy, Marcin

AU - Budzynska, Katarzyna

AU - Reed, Chris

PY - 2019/2/9

Y1 - 2019/2/9

N2 - In this paper we present US2016, the largest publicly available set of corpora of annotated dialogical argumentation. The annotation covers argumentative relations, dialogue acts and pragmatic features. The corpora comprise transcriptions of television debates leading up to the 2016 US presidential elections, and reactions to the debates on Reddit. These two constitutive parts of the corpora are integrated by means of the intertextual correspondence between them. The rhetorical richness and high argument density of the communicative context results in cross-genre corpora that are robust resources for the study of the dialogical dynamics of argumentation in three ways: first, in empirical strands of research in discourse analysis and argumentation studies; second, in the burgeoning field of argument mining where automatic techniques require such data; and third, in formulating algorithmic techniques for sensemaking through the development of Argument Analytics.

AB - In this paper we present US2016, the largest publicly available set of corpora of annotated dialogical argumentation. The annotation covers argumentative relations, dialogue acts and pragmatic features. The corpora comprise transcriptions of television debates leading up to the 2016 US presidential elections, and reactions to the debates on Reddit. These two constitutive parts of the corpora are integrated by means of the intertextual correspondence between them. The rhetorical richness and high argument density of the communicative context results in cross-genre corpora that are robust resources for the study of the dialogical dynamics of argumentation in three ways: first, in empirical strands of research in discourse analysis and argumentation studies; second, in the burgeoning field of argument mining where automatic techniques require such data; and third, in formulating algorithmic techniques for sensemaking through the development of Argument Analytics.

KW - Argumentation

KW - Corpus

KW - Intertextual correspondence

KW - Political discourse

KW - Reddit

KW - Television debate

KW - US elections

UR - https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/en/publications/19d30157-4343-4675-ab1f-f168a54ce169

U2 - 10.1007/s10579-019-09446-8

DO - 10.1007/s10579-019-09446-8

M3 - Article

JO - Language Resources and Evaluation

JF - Language Resources and Evaluation

SN - 1574-020X

ER -