Argumentation in the intelligence domain

Jacky Visser; Dimitra Zografistou; John Lawrence; Chris Reed

Argumentation in the intelligence domain

Jacky Visser, Dimitra Zografistou, John Lawrence, Chris Reed

Computing

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aiming to explain past events or predict future events, intelligence analysts reason about collections of often unreliable, ambiguous and incomplete evidence to support or reject alternative hypotheses. Argumentation plays an important role in both the collaborative reasoning process within teams of analysts, and the final documents in which the outcomes of the analysis are reported. We explore the commonalities between standpoints and arguments on the one hand and hypotheses and evidence on the other.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the Tenth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation
Pages	915-923
Publication status	Published - 2024
Event	10th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA 2023) - Leiden University , Leiden, Netherlands Duration: 4 Jul 2023 → 7 Jul 2023 Conference number: 10 https://ilias-argumentation.com/issa/

Conference

Conference	10th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA 2023)
Abbreviated title	ISSA 2023
Country/Territory	Netherlands
City	Leiden
Period	4/07/23 → 7/07/23
Internet address	https://ilias-argumentation.com/issa/

Keywords

analysis of competing hypotheses
argument diagramming
argument interchange format

Access to Document

Final Published VersionFinal published version, 864 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@inproceedings{374e8fa41c9040be9af8811c86e67075,

title = "Argumentation in the intelligence domain",

abstract = "Aiming to explain past events or predict future events, intelligence analysts reason about collections of often unreliable, ambiguous and incomplete evidence to support or reject alternative hypotheses. Argumentation plays an important role in both the collaborative reasoning process within teams of analysts, and the final documents in which the outcomes of the analysis are reported. We explore the commonalities between standpoints and arguments on the one hand and hypotheses and evidence on the other.",

keywords = "analysis of competing hypotheses, argument diagramming, argument interchange format",

author = "Jacky Visser and Dimitra Zografistou and John Lawrence and Chris Reed",

year = "2024",

language = "English",

pages = "915--923",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the Tenth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation",

note = "10th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA 2023), ISSA 2023 ; Conference date: 04-07-2023 Through 07-07-2023",

url = "https://ilias-argumentation.com/issa/",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Argumentation in the intelligence domain

AU - Visser, Jacky

AU - Zografistou, Dimitra

AU - Lawrence, John

AU - Reed, Chris

N1 - Conference code: 10

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Aiming to explain past events or predict future events, intelligence analysts reason about collections of often unreliable, ambiguous and incomplete evidence to support or reject alternative hypotheses. Argumentation plays an important role in both the collaborative reasoning process within teams of analysts, and the final documents in which the outcomes of the analysis are reported. We explore the commonalities between standpoints and arguments on the one hand and hypotheses and evidence on the other.

AB - Aiming to explain past events or predict future events, intelligence analysts reason about collections of often unreliable, ambiguous and incomplete evidence to support or reject alternative hypotheses. Argumentation plays an important role in both the collaborative reasoning process within teams of analysts, and the final documents in which the outcomes of the analysis are reported. We explore the commonalities between standpoints and arguments on the one hand and hypotheses and evidence on the other.

KW - analysis of competing hypotheses

KW - argument diagramming

KW - argument interchange format

UR - https://ilias-argumentation.com/issa/

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 915

EP - 923

BT - Proceedings of the Tenth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation

T2 - 10th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA 2023)

Y2 - 4 July 2023 through 7 July 2023

ER -

Argumentation in the intelligence domain

Abstract

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Argumentation in the intelligence domain

Cite this