Artificial oocyte activation improves ICSI outcomes following unexplained fertilization abnormalities

C. L. Nicholson, M. Dean, Ahmed Attia, P. A. Milne, Sarah Martins Da Silva (Lead / Corresponding author)

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Research question: Is artificial oocyte activation (AOA) effective for patients with unexplained low or no fertilization following IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)? Design: All IVF/ICSI cases resulting in total fertilization failure or fertilization rate ≤25% at Ninewells Assisted Conception Unit, Dundee between January 2014 and December 2021 (n = 231) were reviewed contemporaneously. After exclusion of obvious stimulation, egg, sperm and/or assisted reproductive technology laboratory factors, patients with at least one cycle of IVF/ICSI resulting in apparently unexplained fertilization abnormalities were offered research investigations, including sperm immunocytochemistry for phospholipase C zeta (PLCζ) protein expression. This retrospective case–control cohort study evaluated laboratory and clinical outcomes for 39 couples (15 attended for sperm studies research) that subsequently undertook ICSI-AOA with Ca 2+ ionophore. Results: Comparing preceding IVF/ICSI and subsequent ICSI-AOA for each patient, the number of eggs collected was similar; however, ICSI-AOA resulted in a significantly improved fertilization rate (57.2% versus 7.1%; P < 0.0001). The uplift for a subset of 10 patients identified with PLCζ deficiency was 66.3% versus 4.6% (P < 0.0001). Overall, ICSI-AOA resulted in a higher number of fresh embryo transfers (94.6% versus 33.3%; P < 0.0001), a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR; 18.9% versus 2.6%; P = 0.02), a significant increase in cycles with surplus embryos suitable for cryostorage (43.6% versus 0%; P < 0.0001), and increased cumulative CPR (41.0% versus 2.6%; P < 0.0001) and LBR (38.5% versus 2.6%; P < 0.0001). Conclusion: AOA is a powerful tool that can transform clinical outcomes for couples experiencing apparently unexplained fertilization abnormalities. PLCζ assays have the potential to be valuable diagnostic tools to determine patient selection for ICSI-AOA, and research efforts should continue to focus on their development.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number104327
    Number of pages9
    JournalReproductive BioMedicine Online
    Volume49
    Issue number5
    Early online date22 Jun 2024
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2024

    Keywords

    • ICSI
    • Fertilisation Failure
    • Artificial Oocyte Activation
    • sperm
    • phospholipase C zeta
    • Phospholipase C zeta
    • Artificial oocyte activation
    • Sperm
    • Fertilization failure

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Reproductive Medicine
    • Obstetrics and Gynaecology
    • Developmental Biology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Artificial oocyte activation improves ICSI outcomes following unexplained fertilization abnormalities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this